
Lindenwood
18-15GAME THAT MATTERSAT
35.7%Lindenwood
64.3%Charleston Southern
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADCharleston Southern -3.9
PROJECTED TOTAL160.6
MODEL MONEYLINECharleston Southern -180

Charleston Southern
15-17MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreLindenwood 78
Projected Total160.6
Projected ScoreCharleston Southern 82
Team Comparison
46.8MMH Power Index47.5
105.5Offensive Efficiency110.1
98.6Defensive Efficiency105.7
6.9Net Efficiency4.4
-6.8Strength of Schedule-3.5
-1.4Last 10 Net Efficiency-2.8
73.7Tempo75.8
50.2%Effective FG%55.3%
18.3%Turnover Rate18.4%
34.0%Offensive Rebound %30.6%
37.9%Free Throw Rate30.8%
5.1Average Margin3.3
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ
Lindenwood HAS THE EDGE
WIN PROBABILITY64.3%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
7–4
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMLindenwood holds the advantage in defensive efficiency (98.6–105.7), net efficiency (6.9–4.4), recent form (-1.4–-2.8), ball security (18.3–18.4).
Charleston Southern COUNTERS WITHMMH Power Index (47.5–46.8), offensive efficiency (110.1–105.5), strength of schedule (-3.5–-6.8).