
Hofstra
24-11GAME THAT MATTERSAT
89.3%Hofstra
10.7%Bucknell
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADHofstra -12.9
PROJECTED TOTAL143.3
MODEL MONEYLINEHofstra -835

Bucknell
10-23MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreHofstra 78
Projected Total143.3
Projected ScoreBucknell 65
Team Comparison
59.3MMH Power Index35.7
114.0Offensive Efficiency99.5
100.9Defensive Efficiency112.8
13.1Net Efficiency-13.3
-2.9Strength of Schedule2.0
14.0Last 10 Net Efficiency-11.5
66.2Tempo67.7
52.2%Effective FG%48.4%
16.1%Turnover Rate19.0%
35.0%Offensive Rebound %26.6%
32.0%Free Throw Rate30.7%
8.7Average Margin-8.9
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ
Hofstra HAS THE EDGE
WIN PROBABILITY89.3%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
10–1
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMHofstra holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (59.3–35.7), offensive efficiency (114.0–99.5), defensive efficiency (100.9–112.8), net efficiency (13.1–-13.3).
Bucknell COUNTERS WITHstrength of schedule (2.0–-2.9).