Hofstra logo

Hofstra

24-11
GAME THAT MATTERSAT
89.3%Hofstra
10.7%Bucknell
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADHofstra -12.9
PROJECTED TOTAL143.3
MODEL MONEYLINEHofstra -835
Bucknell logo

Bucknell

10-23
MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreHofstra 78
Projected Total143.3
Projected ScoreBucknell 65

Team Comparison

59.3MMH Power Index35.7
114.0Offensive Efficiency99.5
100.9Defensive Efficiency112.8
13.1Net Efficiency-13.3
-2.9Strength of Schedule2.0
14.0Last 10 Net Efficiency-11.5
66.2Tempo67.7
52.2%Effective FG%48.4%
16.1%Turnover Rate19.0%
35.0%Offensive Rebound %26.6%
32.0%Free Throw Rate30.7%
8.7Average Margin-8.9
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ

Hofstra HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY89.3%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
10–1
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMHofstra holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (59.3–35.7), offensive efficiency (114.0–99.5), defensive efficiency (100.9–112.8), net efficiency (13.1–-13.3).
Bucknell COUNTERS WITHstrength of schedule (2.0–-2.9).
Final
Hofstra logo
Hofstra
83—77
Bucknell logo
Bucknell
Hofstra by 6 • 74.6 estimated possessions

Team Stats

HofstraTEAM STATBucknell
26-57FG25-59
46.0%FG%42.0%
10-243PT9-28
42.0%3PT%32.0%
21-32FT18-21
66.0%FT%86.0%
33Rebounds35
10Offensive Rebounds11
15Assists13
12Turnovers17
9Steals7
2Blocks2
15Fouls26

Player Box Score

Hofstra
PlayerPosMinFG3PTFTREBASTSTLBLKTOPFPTS
Preston EdmeadG376-134-87-915200023
Cruz DavisG407-152-42-525000018
Biggie PattersonG275-101-46-870200017
Victory OnuetuF284-60-03-4122220011
German PlotnikovG293-72-42-250200010
A.J. WillsG111-31-30-00000003
Silas SundayF120-20-01-25200001
Joshua DeCadyF130-00-00-20110000
Joshua Aaron ReavesG30-10-10-00000000
Bucknell
PlayerPosMinFG3PTFTREBASTSTLBLKTOPFPTS
Ruot BijiekF325-143-102-261210015
Amon DörriesC314-111-46-870000015
Jayden WilliamsG276-82-21-144200015
Achile SpadoneG303-102-65-651100013
Aleksander PachuckiG132-31-20-02200005
Pat CurtinG100-20-04-40010004
Jacob MeachemG92-30-10-00200004
Josh FultonG92-30-10-02000004
Grgur BrcicC151-10-00-04110002
Brandon McCreeshG230-30-20-01201000
Quin BergerG10-10-00-00000000

Advanced Game Stats

74.6Possessions74.6
111.3Offensive Efficiency103.2
103.2Defensive Efficiency111.3
8.0Net Efficiency-8.0
54.4%Effective FG%50.0%
57.5%True Shooting %55.8%
16.2%Turnover Rate22.7%
56.1%Free Throw Rate35.6%
42.1%3-Point Rate47.5%
1.25Assist / Turnover0.76
Game Summary
Hofstra won by 6 points. The game played at approximately 74.6 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Free Throw Rate, Net Efficiency, Offensive Efficiency.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.