High Point

31-5

GAME THAT MATTERSAT

69.8%High Point

30.2%UAB

MMH WIN PROBABILITY

MODEL SPREADHigh Point -5.6

PROJECTED TOTAL160.6

MODEL MONEYLINEHigh Point -231

UAB

20-12

MMH MODEL PROJECTION

Projected ScoreHigh Point 83

Projected Total160.6

Projected ScoreUAB 77

Team Comparison

High PointMetricUAB

69MMH Power Index56.9

123.8Offensive Efficiency110.5

98.3Defensive Efficiency102.9

25.5Net Efficiency7.6

-5.8Strength of Schedule0.4

16.5Last 10 Net Efficiency2.9

72.4Tempo71.7

56.6%Effective FG%48.8%

12.8%Turnover Rate12.4%

33.2%Offensive Rebound %32.7%

42.4%Free Throw Rate36.9%

18.5Average Margin5.4

MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE

MODEL READ

High Point HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY69.8%

STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE

9–2

MMH comparison metrics

WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMHigh Point holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (69.0–56.9), offensive efficiency (123.8–110.5), defensive efficiency (98.3–102.9), net efficiency (25.5–7.6).

UAB COUNTERS WITHstrength of schedule (0.4–-5.8), ball security (12.4–12.8).

Final

High Point

74—91

UAB

UAB by 17 • 78.2 estimated possessions

Team Stats

High PointTEAM STATUAB

24-60FG30-59

40.0%FG%51.0%

4-233PT4-13

17.0%3PT%31.0%

22-31FT27-35

71.0%FT%77.0%

36Rebounds38

11Offensive Rebounds9

16Assists16

15Turnovers11

8Steals9

3Blocks4

23Fouls18

Player Box Score

High Point

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Rob Martin	G	39	7-17	2-5	5-8	7	7	2	0	21
Cam'Ron Fletcher	F	33	7-12	0-4	6-8	12	0	1	0	20
Owen Aquino	F	35	5-12	0-0	0-2	4	4	1	1	10
Conrad Martinez	G	12	3-4	2-3	0-0	1	2	0	0	8
Scotty Washington	G	14	0-3	0-2	6-7	1	0	1	0	6
Vincent Brady II	G	20	1-2	0-1	3-4	1	2	0	1	5
Terry Anderson	F	22	1-5	0-3	2-2	7	0	0	1	4
Chase Johnston	G	13	0-4	0-4	0-0	0	1	1	0	0
Braden Hausen	F	8	0-1	0-1	0-0	0	0	1	0	0
Youssouf Singare	F	2	0-0	0-0	0-0	0	0	0	0	0
Babacar Diallo	G	2	0-0	0-0	0-0	0	0	1	0	0

UAB

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Chance Westry	G	20	6-9	0-1	10-13	5	6	1	0	22
Ahmad Robinson	G	34	4-11	4-5	4-6	3	4	2	0	16
Jacob Meyer	G	33	6-12	0-3	4-4	2	1	0	0	16
Quaran McPherson	G	18	2-5	0-1	7-8	1	3	1	0	11
Daniel Rivera	F	31	5-9	0-0	0-2	6	1	0	2	10
Evan Chatman	F	26	3-5	0-1	0-0	7	1	2	1	6
KyeRon Lindsay-Martin	F	23	3-5	0-0	0-0	3	0	3	1	6
Dayjaun Anderson	G	9	1-3	0-2	0-0	2	0	0	0	2
Salim London	G	6	0-0	0-0	2-2	1	0	0	0	2

Advanced Game Stats

78.2Possessions78.2

94.6Offensive Efficiency116.4

116.4Defensive Efficiency94.6

-21.7Net Efficiency21.7

43.3%Effective FG%54.2%

49.5%True Shooting %60.2%

19.1%Turnover Rate14.2%

51.7%Free Throw Rate59.3%

38.3%3-Point Rate22.0%

1.07Assist / Turnover1.45

Game Summary

UAB won by 17 points. The game played at approximately 78.2 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Net Efficiency, Offensive Efficiency, Defensive Efficiency.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.