
East Texas A&M
11-21GAME THAT MATTERSAT
22.2%East Texas A&M
77.8%Rice
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADRice -8.7
PROJECTED TOTAL147.8
MODEL MONEYLINERice -350

Rice
13-18MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreEast Texas A&M 70
Projected Total147.8
Projected ScoreRice 78
Team Comparison
38.4MMH Power Index45.1
101.2Offensive Efficiency108.3
107.5Defensive Efficiency109.2
-6.3Net Efficiency-0.9
-1.5Strength of Schedule-2.2
-9.1Last 10 Net Efficiency-4.3
69.3Tempo68.3
50.7%Effective FG%49.7%
18.7%Turnover Rate17.8%
26.3%Offensive Rebound %35.7%
31.9%Free Throw Rate34.7%
-4.3Average Margin-0.6
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ
Rice HAS THE EDGE
WIN PROBABILITY77.8%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
8–3
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMRice holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (45.1–38.4), offensive efficiency (108.3–101.2), net efficiency (-0.9–-6.3), recent form (-4.3–-9.1).
East Texas A&M COUNTERS WITHdefensive efficiency (107.5–109.2), strength of schedule (-1.5–-2.2), shooting efficiency (50.7–49.7).