
Drexel
17-16GAME THAT MATTERSAT
24.2%Drexel
75.8%Syracuse
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADSyracuse -7.7
PROJECTED TOTAL142.1
MODEL MONEYLINESyracuse -313

Syracuse
15-16MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreDrexel 67
Projected Total142.1
Projected ScoreSyracuse 75
Team Comparison
46.5MMH Power Index52.2
103.6Offensive Efficiency109.2
102.4Defensive Efficiency106.6
1.2Net Efficiency2.6
-0.4Strength of Schedule5.6
-4.7Last 10 Net Efficiency-15.1
65.7Tempo69.0
51.3%Effective FG%52.9%
19.1%Turnover Rate15.6%
30.7%Offensive Rebound %29.0%
32.3%Free Throw Rate36.2%
0.8Average Margin1.8
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ
Syracuse HAS THE EDGE
WIN PROBABILITY75.8%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
8–3
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMSyracuse holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (52.2–46.5), offensive efficiency (109.2–103.6), net efficiency (2.6–1.2), strength of schedule (5.6–-0.4).
Drexel COUNTERS WITHdefensive efficiency (102.4–106.6), recent form (-4.7–-15.1), offensive rebounding (30.7–29.0).