
Merrimack
23-11GAME THAT MATTERSAT
46.7%Merrimack
53.3%Boston University
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADBoston University -1.5
PROJECTED TOTAL142.2
MODEL MONEYLINEBoston University -114

Boston University
16-18MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreMerrimack 70
Projected Total142.2
Projected ScoreBoston University 72
Team Comparison
53.7MMH Power Index50.3
106.4Offensive Efficiency115.3
103.2Defensive Efficiency113.1
3.2Net Efficiency2.2
0.7Strength of Schedule-2.7
12.9Last 10 Net Efficiency11.2
64.4Tempo65.4
49.3%Effective FG%58.6%
14.8%Turnover Rate17.7%
24.7%Offensive Rebound %27.4%
39.5%Free Throw Rate32.2%
2.1Average Margin1.5
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ
Merrimack HAS THE EDGE
WIN PROBABILITY53.3%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
8–3
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMMerrimack holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (53.7–50.3), defensive efficiency (103.2–113.1), net efficiency (3.2–2.2), strength of schedule (0.7–-2.7).
Boston University COUNTERS WITHoffensive efficiency (115.3–106.4), shooting efficiency (58.6–49.3), offensive rebounding (27.4–24.7).