Sacred Heart logo

Sacred Heart

14-19
GAME THAT MATTERSAT
16.3%Sacred Heart
83.7%Queens University
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADQueens University -10.0
PROJECTED TOTAL164.2
MODEL MONEYLINEQueens University -513
Queens University logo

Queens University

21-14
MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreSacred Heart 77
Projected Total164.2
Projected ScoreQueens University 87

Team Comparison

41.6MMH Power Index51.7
109.6Offensive Efficiency118.4
111.6Defensive Efficiency117.0
-2.0Net Efficiency1.4
-3.9Strength of Schedule0.1
-4.6Last 10 Net Efficiency1.5
68.6Tempo71.4
52.5%Effective FG%56.6%
17.6%Turnover Rate14.8%
28.8%Offensive Rebound %29.6%
31.2%Free Throw Rate37.6%
-1.4Average Margin0.9
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ

Queens University HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY83.7%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
10–1
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMQueens University holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (51.7–41.6), offensive efficiency (118.4–109.6), net efficiency (1.4–-2.0), strength of schedule (0.1–-3.9).
Sacred Heart COUNTERS WITHdefensive efficiency (111.6–117.0).
Final
Sacred Heart logo
Sacred Heart
64—81
Queens University logo
Queens University
Queens University by 17 • 69.5 estimated possessions

Team Stats

Sacred HeartTEAM STATQueens University
23-65FG29-59
35.0%FG%49.0%
10-323PT16-36
31.0%3PT%44.0%
8-11FT7-8
73.0%FT%88.0%
32Rebounds39
13Offensive Rebounds9
9Assists20
12Turnovers16
8Steals6
1Blocks7
11Fouls15

Player Box Score

Sacred Heart
PlayerPosMinFG3PTFTREBASTSTLBLKTOPFPTS
Anquan HillF318-171-82-270000019
Taj BryantG304-63-33-582000014
Dashon GittensG304-102-50-030210010
Abdou YaddF173-61-30-01120007
Mekhi ConnerG311-81-53-42420006
Yann FarellF331-101-70-03110003
Fallou GueyeG171-31-10-00110003
Jaden SlaughterG111-50-00-04000002
Queens University
PlayerPosMinFG3PTFTREBASTSTLBLKTOPFPTS
Carson SchwiegerF196-95-80-040000017
Nasir MannG326-102-61-164200015
Chris AshbyG315-105-100-022100015
Avantae ParkerF215-100-00-052100010
Yoav BermanG272-102-83-34302009
Maban JabrielF172-42-32-22200008
Jordan WatfordG192-30-00-03410004
Gus LarsonF181-20-01-29214003
Kam ClarkF120-10-10-02101000
Isaiah HenryG30-00-00-00000000
Reid CelestinG10-00-00-00000000

Advanced Game Stats

69.5Possessions69.5
92.1Offensive Efficiency116.5
116.5Defensive Efficiency92.1
-24.5Net Efficiency24.5
43.1%Effective FG%62.7%
45.6%True Shooting %64.5%
17.3%Turnover Rate22.9%
16.9%Free Throw Rate13.6%
49.2%3-Point Rate61.0%
0.75Assist / Turnover1.25
Game Summary
Queens University won by 17 points. The game played at approximately 69.5 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Net Efficiency, Offensive Efficiency, Defensive Efficiency.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.