Miami (OH)

32-2

GAME THAT MATTERSAT

97.6%Miami (OH)

2.4%Air Force

MMH WIN PROBABILITY

MODEL SPREADMiami (OH) -24.2

PROJECTED TOTAL155.8

MODEL MONEYLINEMiami (OH) -4067

Air Force

3-29

MMH MODEL PROJECTION

Projected ScoreMiami (OH) 90

Projected Total155.8

Projected ScoreAir Force 66

Team Comparison

Miami (OH)MetricAir Force

60.7MMH Power Index23

123.1Offensive Efficiency91.3

103.7Defensive Efficiency118.5

19.4Net Efficiency-27.2

-5.6Strength of Schedule6.2

5.5Last 10 Net Efficiency-33.5

72.8Tempo67.4

60.6%Effective FG%49.0%

14.2%Turnover Rate21.9%

26.3%Offensive Rebound %21.4%

40.1%Free Throw Rate35.9%

14.1Average Margin-18.3

MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE

MODEL READ

Miami (OH) HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY97.6%

STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE

10–1

MMH comparison metrics

WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMMiami (OH) holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (60.7–23.0), offensive efficiency (123.1–91.3), defensive efficiency (103.7–118.5), net efficiency (19.4–-27.2).

Air Force COUNTERS WITHstrength of schedule (6.2–-5.6).

Final

Miami (OH)

76—61

Air Force

Miami (OH) by 15 • 67.0 estimated possessions

Team Stats

Miami (OH)TEAM STATAir Force

30-64FG21-51

47.0%FG%41.0%

13-313PT5-18

42.0%3PT%28.0%

3-5FT14-22

60.0%FT%64.0%

41Rebounds31

11Offensive Rebounds6

14Assists12

11Turnovers12

5Steals10

4Blocks—

18Fouls11

Player Box Score

Miami (OH)

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Brant Byers	G	29	6-17	4-12	2-2	5	0	0	0	18
Evan Ipsaro	G	32	5-8	1-2	1-3	1	7	0	0	12
Luke Skaljac	G	24	4-7	2-3	0-0	0	2	2	0	10
Peter Suder	G	31	4-8	1-2	0-0	2	1	1	0	9
Antwone Woolfolk	F	22	4-9	1-1	0-0	13	0	1	3	9
Almar Atlason	F	16	2-3	2-3	0-0	0	1	1	0	6
Eian Elmer	G	17	2-5	1-3	0-0	9	0	0	0	5
Kyle Waltz	F	9	1-3	1-3	0-0	2	1	0	0	3
Trey Perry	G	11	1-2	0-1	0-0	2	2	0	0	2
Tyler Robbins	F	9	1-2	0-1	0-0	2	0	0	1	2

Air Force

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	PTS
Caleb Walker	F	25	6-8	0-0	5-12	8	1	1	17
Lucas Hobin	F	31	5-12	4-9	2-2	4	1	0	16
Eli Robinson	F	40	5-9	1-1	2-2	4	5	2	13
Kam Sanders	G	31	1-9	0-4	4-4	4	3	3	6
Wesley Celichowski	C	13	2-3	0-1	1-2	3	0	0	5
Kyle Marshall	G	16	1-4	0-1	0-0	2	0	0	2
Kolby Gilles	F	8	1-2	0-1	0-0	2	0	0	2
Ethan Greenberg	G	32	0-3	0-1	0-0	3	2	4	0
Justin Hinds	G	4	0-1	0-0	0-0	0	0	0	0

Advanced Game Stats

67.0Possessions67.0

113.4Offensive Efficiency91.0

91.0Defensive Efficiency113.4

22.4Net Efficiency-22.4

57.0%Effective FG%46.1%

57.3%True Shooting %49.6%

16.6%Turnover Rate17.8%

7.8%Free Throw Rate43.1%

48.4%3-Point Rate35.3%

1.27Assist / Turnover1.00

Game Summary

Miami (OH) won by 15 points. The game played at approximately 67.0 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Net Efficiency, Free Throw Rate, Offensive Efficiency.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.