Harvard

17-12

GAME THAT MATTERSAT

77.7%Harvard

22.3%Army

MMH WIN PROBABILITY

MODEL SPREADHarvard -6.8

PROJECTED TOTAL143.3

MODEL MONEYLINEHarvard -348

Army

11-21

MMH MODEL PROJECTION

Projected ScoreHarvard 75

Projected Total143.3

Projected ScoreArmy 68

Team Comparison

HarvardMetricArmy

52.6MMH Power Index36.8

108.1Offensive Efficiency104.8

102.9Defensive Efficiency112.1

5.2Net Efficiency-7.3

-0.1Strength of Schedule-3.3

8.3Last 10 Net Efficiency-10.6

64.8Tempo68.9

53.4%Effective FG%49.8%

17.2%Turnover Rate17.3%

26.3%Offensive Rebound %31.0%

27.9%Free Throw Rate26.5%

3.4Average Margin-5.1

MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE

MODEL READ

Harvard HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY77.7%

STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE

10–1

MMH comparison metrics

WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMHarvard holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (52.6–36.8), offensive efficiency (108.1–104.8), defensive efficiency (102.9–112.1), net efficiency (5.2–-7.3).

Army COUNTERS WITHoffensive rebounding (31.0–26.3).

Final

Harvard

75—52

Army

Harvard by 23 • 63.6 estimated possessions

Team Stats

HarvardTEAM STATArmy

25-48FG20-53

52.0%FG%38.0%

7-183PT5-25

39.0%3PT%20.0%

18-22FT7-12

82.0%FT%58.0%

30Rebounds31

7Offensive Rebounds11

16Assists11

12Turnovers16

12Steals6

3Blocks—

13Fouls19

Player Box Score

Harvard

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Thomas Batties III	F	24	5-6	3-3	4-4	5	1	0	3	17
Robert Hinton	G	34	6-11	1-3	3-4	6	3	2	0	16
Chandler Pigge	G	32	6-8	2-2	0-0	5	4	2	0	14
Tey Barbour	G	33	1-6	0-5	7-7	3	4	2	0	9
Ben Eisendrath	G	26	2-2	0-0	2-3	1	2	4	0	6
Kenan Parrish	F	4	2-3	0-1	0-0	0	0	0	0	4
Frankie Mannino	G	10	1-5	0-2	1-2	3	0	1	0	3
Dutch Dowdell	G	7	1-1	1-1	0-0	0	0	0	0	3
Xavier Nesbitt	G	11	1-2	0-1	0-0	0	2	0	0	2
Ryan Sullivan	F	6	0-1	0-0	1-2	3	0	1	0	1
Luca Ace-Nasteski	F	4	0-0	0-0	0-0	1	0	0	0	0
Joseph Quartey	G	3	0-1	0-0	0-0	0	0	0	0	0
Avner Dror	F	2	0-1	0-0	0-0	1	0	0	0	0
Payton Pitts	G	2	0-1	0-0	0-0	0	0	0	0	0
Greg Cooper	G	2	0-0	0-0	0-0	1	0	0	0	0

Army

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	PTS
Ryan Curry	G	27	4-10	3-6	0-0	4	3	0	11
Jaxson Bell	G	16	3-9	0-3	5-6	1	0	2	11
Tate Laczkowski	F	23	3-4	0-0	0-0	3	2	1	6
Jacen Holloway	F	22	3-4	0-0	0-2	3	2	0	6
Jackson Furman	G	15	2-4	2-4	0-2	2	0	0	6
Jorn Everson	F	13	3-7	0-3	0-0	4	0	0	6
Joshua Eli	F	12	1-2	0-0	0-0	2	0	0	2
Jahaan Green	G	9	1-1	0-0	0-0	0	0	0	2
Dillon Watt	G	5	0-0	0-0	2-2	0	1	0	2
Kevin McCarthy	G	21	0-5	0-3	0-0	1	1	1	0
Dylan Murans	F	9	0-2	0-2	0-0	0	0	0	0
Alex Engro	G	8	0-3	0-2	0-0	1	0	0	0
Dylan Benner	F	6	0-0	0-0	0-0	1	1	0	0
Dayon Polk	G	6	0-0	0-0	0-0	0	0	2	0
Jackson Mayo	G	6	0-1	0-1	0-0	1	1	0	0
Brendon O'Keefe	G	2	0-1	0-1	0-0	1	0	0	0

Advanced Game Stats

63.6Possessions63.6

117.9Offensive Efficiency81.8

81.8Defensive Efficiency117.9

36.2Net Efficiency-36.2

59.4%Effective FG%42.5%

64.2%True Shooting %44.3%

18.9%Turnover Rate25.1%

45.8%Free Throw Rate22.6%

37.5%3-Point Rate47.2%

1.33Assist / Turnover0.69

Game Summary

Harvard won by 23 points. The game played at approximately 63.6 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Net Efficiency, Offensive Efficiency, Defensive Efficiency.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.