Arkansas-Pine Bluff

13-19

GAME THAT MATTERSAT

2.0%Arkansas-Pine Bluff

98.0%Vanderbilt

MMH WIN PROBABILITY

MODEL SPREADVanderbilt -25.4

PROJECTED TOTAL163.8

MODEL MONEYLINEVanderbilt -4900

Vanderbilt

27-9

MMH MODEL PROJECTION

Projected ScoreArkansas-Pine Bluff 69

Projected Total163.8

Projected ScoreVanderbilt 95

Team Comparison

Arkansas-Pine BluffMetricVanderbilt

38.7MMH Power Index68.9

106.4Offensive Efficiency120.9

111.6Defensive Efficiency105.7

-5.2Net Efficiency15.2

-6.0Strength of Schedule7.4

1.3Last 10 Net Efficiency2.7

72.6Tempo70.9

51.4%Effective FG%55.3%

18.5%Turnover Rate13.5%

29.3%Offensive Rebound %30.8%

37.7%Free Throw Rate39.3%

-3.8Average Margin10.8

MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE

MODEL READ

Vanderbilt HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY98.0%

STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE

11–0

MMH comparison metrics

WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMVanderbilt holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (68.9–38.7), offensive efficiency (120.9–106.4), defensive efficiency (105.7–111.6), net efficiency (15.2–-5.2).

Final

Arkansas-Pine Bluff

75—104

Vanderbilt

Vanderbilt by 29 • 74.6 estimated possessions

Team Stats

Arkansas-Pine BluffTEAM STATVanderbilt

23-57FG34-71

40.0%FG%48.0%

10-243PT11-34

42.0%3PT%32.0%

19-26FT25-33

73.0%FT%76.0%

28Rebounds49

8Offensive Rebounds19

11Assists18

13Turnovers7

3Steals9

2Blocks7

23Fouls17

Player Box Score

Arkansas-Pine Bluff

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Trevon Payton	G	36	7-11	5-8	3-4	2	1	0	0	22
Quion Williams	G	36	6-14	0-2	8-10	4	3	1	0	20
Milhan Charles	G	32	2-10	0-2	2-4	1	2	2	1	6
Jai'chaunn Hayes	G	18	2-3	1-2	1-2	3	0	0	0	6
Alex Mirhosseini	G	27	1-5	1-4	2-2	3	1	0	0	5
Jaquan Scott	F	22	2-8	1-2	0-0	7	2	0	1	5
Kyle Brown	F	15	1-2	1-2	2-2	4	1	0	0	5
Ahmad Johnson	G	10	2-3	1-2	0-0	1	0	0	0	5
Dennis Asoro	F	4	0-1	0-0	1-2	1	1	0	0	1

Vanderbilt

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Duke Miles	G	31	6-13	2-7	6-9	4	6	5	0	20
Devin McGlockton	F	26	8-10	1-2	0-0	9	0	1	1	17
AK Okereke	F	25	3-7	1-3	7-8	6	1	0	1	14
Tyler Harris	F	20	4-10	3-7	2-2	4	0	0	1	13
Tyler Tanner	G	30	4-11	0-3	4-5	4	9	1	0	12
Tyler Nickel	F	29	3-9	3-8	2-4	8	1	0	1	11
Chandler Bing	G	15	3-6	0-2	2-3	5	0	0	1	8
Mike James	G	3	2-2	1-1	0-0	1	0	0	0	5
Jalen Washington	C	14	1-3	0-1	2-2	6	1	2	2	4
Jayden Leverett	C	3	0-0	0-0	0-0	1	0	0	0	0
Jaylon Dean-Vines	G	2	0-0	0-0	0-0	0	0	0	0	0
Miles Keeffe	G	2	0-0	0-0	0-0	0	0	0	0	0

Advanced Game Stats

74.6Possessions74.6

100.5Offensive Efficiency139.4

139.4Defensive Efficiency100.5

-38.9Net Efficiency38.9

49.1%Effective FG%55.6%

54.1%True Shooting %60.0%

17.5%Turnover Rate9.4%

45.6%Free Throw Rate46.5%

42.1%3-Point Rate47.9%

0.85Assist / Turnover2.57

Game Summary

Vanderbilt won by 29 points. The game played at approximately 74.6 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Net Efficiency, Offensive Efficiency, Defensive Efficiency.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.