
Binghamton
8-22GAME THAT MATTERSAT
10.6%Binghamton
89.4%Longwood
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADLongwood -14.8
PROJECTED TOTAL145.5
MODEL MONEYLINELongwood -843

Longwood
16-16MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreBinghamton 65
Projected Total145.5
Projected ScoreLongwood 80
Team Comparison
32.4MMH Power Index47
102.2Offensive Efficiency108.1
112.3Defensive Efficiency103.0
-10.1Net Efficiency5.1
-6.0Strength of Schedule-6.4
-6.2Last 10 Net Efficiency2.3
64.2Tempo71.9
51.3%Effective FG%51.4%
18.5%Turnover Rate19.3%
21.5%Offensive Rebound %35.4%
42.8%Free Throw Rate42.0%
-6.5Average Margin3.6
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ
Longwood HAS THE EDGE
WIN PROBABILITY89.4%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
8–3
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMLongwood holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (47.0–32.4), offensive efficiency (108.1–102.2), defensive efficiency (103.0–112.3), net efficiency (5.1–-10.1).
Binghamton COUNTERS WITHstrength of schedule (-6.0–-6.4), ball security (18.5–19.3), free throw rate (42.8–42.0).