
Wright State
23-12GAME THAT MATTERSAT
44.0%Wright State
56.0%Kent State
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADKent State -2.6
PROJECTED TOTAL163.3
MODEL MONEYLINEKent State -127

Kent State
24-10MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreWright State 80
Projected Total163.3
Projected ScoreKent State 83
Team Comparison
57.1MMH Power Index54.7
116.4Offensive Efficiency113.9
106.5Defensive Efficiency107.6
9.9Net Efficiency6.3
-2.0Strength of Schedule-0.1
7.0Last 10 Net Efficiency2.1
69.2Tempo74.0
55.2%Effective FG%53.0%
16.1%Turnover Rate17.7%
33.9%Offensive Rebound %35.0%
38.3%Free Throw Rate43.5%
6.8Average Margin4.7
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ
Wright State HAS THE EDGE
WIN PROBABILITY56.0%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
8–3
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMWright State holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (57.1–54.7), offensive efficiency (116.4–113.9), defensive efficiency (106.5–107.6), net efficiency (9.9–6.3).
Kent State COUNTERS WITHstrength of schedule (-0.1–-2.0), offensive rebounding (35.0–33.9), free throw rate (43.5–38.3).