Lindenwood

18-15

GAME THAT MATTERSAT

49.8%Lindenwood

50.2%Alabama A&M

MMH WIN PROBABILITY

MODEL SPREADLindenwood -0.3

PROJECTED TOTAL149.0

MODEL MONEYLINEAlabama A&M -101

Alabama A&M

18-15

MMH MODEL PROJECTION

Projected ScoreLindenwood 75

Projected Total149.0

Projected ScoreAlabama A&M 74

Team Comparison

LindenwoodMetricAlabama A&M

46.8MMH Power Index42.3

105.5Offensive Efficiency105.9

98.6Defensive Efficiency106.6

6.9Net Efficiency-0.7

-6.8Strength of Schedule-6.8

-1.4Last 10 Net Efficiency3.3

73.7Tempo68.0

50.2%Effective FG%49.7%

18.3%Turnover Rate16.8%

34.0%Offensive Rebound %28.0%

37.9%Free Throw Rate45.7%

5.1Average Margin-0.5

MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE

MODEL READ

Lindenwood HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY50.2%

STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE

6–4

MMH comparison metrics

WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMLindenwood holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (46.8–42.3), defensive efficiency (98.6–106.6), net efficiency (6.9–-0.7), shooting efficiency (50.2–49.7).

Alabama A&M COUNTERS WITHoffensive efficiency (105.9–105.5), recent form (3.3–-1.4), ball security (16.8–18.3).

Final

Lindenwood

65—74

Alabama A&M

Alabama A&M by 9 • 68.0 estimated possessions

Team Stats

LindenwoodTEAM STATAlabama A&M

24-54FG23-51

44.0%FG%45.0%

4-223PT9-21

18.0%3PT%43.0%

13-21FT19-25

62.0%FT%76.0%

31Rebounds32

10Offensive Rebounds8

13Assists12

14Turnovers13

7Steals10

1Blocks4

18Fouls17

Player Box Score

Lindenwood

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Dontrez Williams	G	39	7-13	2-4	3-6	6	2	1	0	19
Anias Futrell	G	25	5-8	2-5	4-5	5	1	2	0	16
Milos Nenadic	C	31	4-13	0-4	1-2	4	1	2	0	9
Clayton Jackson	G	34	3-9	0-5	2-2	2	1	0	0	8
Jadis Jones	G	25	3-3	0-0	1-1	3	6	0	0	7
Mekhi Cooper	G	24	1-5	0-4	2-3	4	2	2	0	4
Robert Lewis	F	18	1-3	0-0	0-0	1	0	0	0	2
Kevin Anthony	C	3	0-0	0-0	0-2	1	0	0	1	0

Alabama A&M

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Sami Pissis	G	34	7-12	3-4	2-2	3	4	2	0	19
Lou Hutchinson	G	20	4-6	3-5	2-3	4	2	0	0	13
Kintavious Dozier	G	33	2-6	1-4	5-6	3	3	2	0	10
Koron Davis	G	19	3-8	0-2	4-6	5	0	3	0	10
PJ Eason	F	31	2-4	0-0	5-6	8	0	1	4	9
James Flippin	F	6	2-3	0-0	0-0	0	0	0	0	4
Gabe Kincy	G	24	1-3	1-2	0-0	5	1	0	0	3
James Graham III	G	17	1-5	0-0	1-2	2	0	1	0	3
Peyton Daniels Sr.	G	12	1-4	1-4	0-0	1	2	0	0	3
Angok Anyang	F	3	0-0	0-0	0-0	0	0	1	0	0

Advanced Game Stats

68.0Possessions68.0

95.6Offensive Efficiency108.8

108.8Defensive Efficiency95.6

-13.2Net Efficiency13.2

48.1%Effective FG%53.9%

50.8%True Shooting %58.8%

20.6%Turnover Rate19.2%

38.9%Free Throw Rate49.0%

40.7%3-Point Rate41.2%

0.93Assist / Turnover0.92

Game Summary

Alabama A&M won by 9 points. The game played at approximately 68.0 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Net Efficiency, Offensive Efficiency, Defensive Efficiency.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.