
Harvard
17-12GAME THAT MATTERSAT
41.8%Harvard
58.2%Marist
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADMarist -4.0
PROJECTED TOTAL133.6
MODEL MONEYLINEMarist -139

Marist
19-12MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreHarvard 65
Projected Total133.6
Projected ScoreMarist 69
Team Comparison
52.6MMH Power Index51
108.1Offensive Efficiency104.3
102.9Defensive Efficiency95.6
5.2Net Efficiency8.7
-0.1Strength of Schedule-3.2
8.3Last 10 Net Efficiency2.9
64.8Tempo66.8
53.4%Effective FG%49.9%
17.2%Turnover Rate16.8%
26.3%Offensive Rebound %29.4%
27.9%Free Throw Rate26.1%
3.4Average Margin5.8
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ
Harvard HAS THE EDGE
WIN PROBABILITY58.2%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
6–5
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMHarvard holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (52.6–51.0), offensive efficiency (108.1–104.3), strength of schedule (-0.1–-3.2), recent form (8.3–2.9).
Marist COUNTERS WITHdefensive efficiency (95.6–102.9), net efficiency (8.7–5.2), ball security (16.8–17.2).