
Colgate
18-15GAME THAT MATTERSAT
25.6%Colgate
74.4%Siena
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADSiena -7.8
PROJECTED TOTAL143.9
MODEL MONEYLINESiena -291

Siena
23-12MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreColgate 68
Projected Total143.9
Projected ScoreSiena 76
Team Comparison
48.8MMH Power Index53.8
111.7Offensive Efficiency109.2
109.0Defensive Efficiency102.2
2.7Net Efficiency7.0
-2.0Strength of Schedule-0.5
-0.3Last 10 Net Efficiency3.0
68.4Tempo64.4
54.5%Effective FG%50.7%
14.8%Turnover Rate15.8%
26.9%Offensive Rebound %31.4%
30.0%Free Throw Rate34.9%
1.8Average Margin4.5
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ
Siena HAS THE EDGE
WIN PROBABILITY74.4%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
8–3
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMSiena holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (53.8–48.8), defensive efficiency (102.2–109.0), net efficiency (7.0–2.7), strength of schedule (-0.5–-2.0).
Colgate COUNTERS WITHoffensive efficiency (111.7–109.2), shooting efficiency (54.5–50.7), ball security (14.8–15.8).