North Alabama

9-21

GAME THAT MATTERSAT

3.6%North Alabama

96.4%Clemson

MMH WIN PROBABILITY

MODEL SPREADClemson -22.0

PROJECTED TOTAL141.4

MODEL MONEYLINEClemson -2678

Clemson

24-10

MMH MODEL PROJECTION

Projected ScoreNorth Alabama 60

Projected Total141.4

Projected ScoreClemson 82

Team Comparison

North AlabamaMetricClemson

34.9MMH Power Index59.9

104.4Offensive Efficiency112.6

116.7Defensive Efficiency101.4

-12.3Net Efficiency11.2

-1.2Strength of Schedule4.6

-16.3Last 10 Net Efficiency-4.7

66.5Tempo63.6

48.9%Effective FG%53.0%

17.2%Turnover Rate14.0%

31.5%Offensive Rebound %27.0%

39.1%Free Throw Rate38.1%

-8.2Average Margin7.2

MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE

MODEL READ

Clemson HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY96.4%

STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE

9–2

MMH comparison metrics

WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMClemson holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (59.9–34.9), offensive efficiency (112.6–104.4), defensive efficiency (101.4–116.7), net efficiency (11.2–-12.3).

North Alabama COUNTERS WITHoffensive rebounding (31.5–27.0), free throw rate (39.1–38.1).

Final

North Alabama

61—81

Clemson

Clemson by 20 • 62.8 estimated possessions

Team Stats

North AlabamaTEAM STATClemson

22-60FG27-61

37.0%FG%44.0%

7-283PT11-35

25.0%3PT%31.0%

10-15FT16-20

67.0%FT%80.0%

29Rebounds45

13Offensive Rebounds19

11Assists18

8Turnovers12

10Steals5

4Blocks6

14Fouls12

Player Box Score

North Alabama

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Kevin de Kovachich	G	25	4-11	2-6	2-3	2	2	2	0	12
Donte Bacchus	F	30	4-9	0-2	2-2	1	1	0	0	10
Dallas Howell	F	22	3-8	2-7	0-0	5	1	2	1	8
DarKaun King	F	18	2-7	1-3	2-2	2	0	0	0	7
Canin Jefferson	G	18	2-4	1-3	0-0	1	1	0	0	5
Corneilous Williams	F	15	2-3	0-0	0-0	4	0	0	0	4
Cortez Graham-Howard	G	14	1-6	1-5	1-2	0	1	1	1	4
Braylon Patton	G	9	1-1	0-0	2-2	1	1	0	0	4
Jamal Albritton	C	18	1-1	0-0	1-2	4	0	0	2	3
Tank Washington	F	15	1-4	0-2	0-2	4	2	1	0	2
Kedar Bodie	G	15	1-6	0-0	0-0	4	2	4	0	2
King Walker	G	1	0-0	0-0	0-0	0	0	0	0	0

Clemson

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
RJ Godfrey	F	29	6-8	0-1	4-4	6	3	1	2	16
Zac Foster	G	23	5-10	3-7	1-1	4	6	0	0	14
Carter Welling	F	27	4-6	0-1	5-6	9	0	0	2	13
Jake Wahlin	F	25	3-7	2-6	0-0	10	0	0	0	8
Jestin Porter	G	20	2-9	1-6	3-5	1	1	1	0	8
Ace Buckner	G	16	2-5	1-4	3-4	7	2	2	0	8
Dillon Hunter	G	20	2-7	2-4	0-0	0	2	1	0	6
Dallas Thomas	F	7	2-4	2-4	0-0	1	0	0	0	6
Nick Davidson	F	17	1-3	0-1	0-0	1	3	0	1	2
Butta Johnson	G	9	0-0	0-0	0-0	2	0	0	0	0
Chase Thompson	F	7	0-2	0-1	0-0	2	1	0	1	0

Advanced Game Stats

62.8Possessions62.8

97.1Offensive Efficiency129.0

129.0Defensive Efficiency97.1

-31.8Net Efficiency31.8

42.5%Effective FG%53.3%

45.4%True Shooting %57.4%

12.9%Turnover Rate18.9%

25.0%Free Throw Rate32.8%

46.7%3-Point Rate57.4%

1.38Assist / Turnover1.50

Game Summary

Clemson won by 20 points. The game played at approximately 62.8 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Net Efficiency, Offensive Efficiency, Defensive Efficiency.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.