Montana logo

Montana

18-16
GAME THAT MATTERSAT
12.9%Montana
87.1%Texas A&M
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADTexas A&M -12.0
PROJECTED TOTAL156.5
MODEL MONEYLINETexas A&M -675
Texas A&M logo

Texas A&M

20-12
MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreMontana 72
Projected Total156.5
Projected ScoreTexas A&M 84

Team Comparison

45.4MMH Power Index58
108.6Offensive Efficiency116.1
104.8Defensive Efficiency108.4
3.8Net Efficiency7.7
-2.4Strength of Schedule4.8
-6.5Last 10 Net Efficiency-7.2
71.2Tempo69.1
56.3%Effective FG%53.5%
19.2%Turnover Rate14.8%
21.9%Offensive Rebound %31.7%
37.7%Free Throw Rate37.5%
2.7Average Margin5.3
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ

Texas A&M HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY87.1%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
7–4
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMTexas A&M holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (58.0–45.4), offensive efficiency (116.1–108.6), net efficiency (7.7–3.8), strength of schedule (4.8–-2.4).
Montana COUNTERS WITHdefensive efficiency (104.8–108.4), recent form (-6.5–-7.2), shooting efficiency (56.3–53.5).
Final
Montana logo
Montana
81—86
Texas A&M logo
Texas A&M
Texas A&M by 5 • 70.0 estimated possessions

Team Stats

MontanaTEAM STATTexas A&M
29-52FG29-54
56.0%FG%54.0%
16-313PT7-23
52.0%3PT%30.0%
7-13FT21-29
54.0%FT%72.0%
27Rebounds30
3Offensive Rebounds7
22Assists22
14Turnovers10
4Steals6
2Blocks2
20Fouls16

Player Box Score

Montana
PlayerPosMinFG3PTFTREBASTSTLBLKTOPFPTS
Money WilliamsG328-115-61-357200022
Brooklyn HicksG227-93-41-220100018
Tyler IsaakG365-102-61-227000013
Te'Jon SawyerF313-71-52-23210009
Tyler ThompsonG263-73-60-05200009
Chase HendersonG111-31-21-21300004
Kenyon AguinoF181-40-11-23102003
Courtney Anderson Jr.G51-11-10-01000003
Amari JedkinsF140-00-00-05000000
Grant KepleyG40-00-00-00000000
Trae TaylorF10-00-00-00000000
Texas A&M
PlayerPosMinFG3PTFTREBASTSTLBLKTOPFPTS
Rylan GriffenG256-92-53-313110017
Rubén DominguezG263-63-63-424000012
Pop IsaacsG234-70-22-224100010
Rashaun AgeeF212-50-26-8102000010
Zach ClemenceF144-42-20-021000010
Marcus HillG183-60-13-53220009
Jamie VinsonF104-50-00-02001008
Jacari LaneG162-30-02-21100006
Josh HollowayG180-30-22-21510002
Federiko FederikoF131-10-00-32000002
Ali DibbaG70-20-00-01010000
Noah ShelbyG50-20-20-00000000
Chris McDermottF40-10-10-01000000

Advanced Game Stats

70.0Possessions70.0
115.7Offensive Efficiency122.9
122.9Defensive Efficiency115.7
-7.1Net Efficiency7.1
71.2%Effective FG%60.2%
69.6%True Shooting %63.4%
20.2%Turnover Rate14.1%
25.0%Free Throw Rate53.7%
59.6%3-Point Rate42.6%
1.57Assist / Turnover2.20
Game Summary
Texas A&M won by 5 points. The game played at approximately 70.0 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Free Throw Rate, Net Efficiency, Effective FG%.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.