
Gardner-Webb
4-29GAME THAT MATTERSAT
5.0%Gardner-Webb
95.0%DePaul
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADDePaul -21.1
PROJECTED TOTAL147.8
MODEL MONEYLINEDePaul -1900

DePaul
16-16MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreGardner-Webb 63
Projected Total147.8
Projected ScoreDePaul 84
Team Comparison
26.6MMH Power Index48.4
96.0Offensive Efficiency103.7
120.4Defensive Efficiency102.7
-24.4Net Efficiency1.0
3.3Strength of Schedule2.0
-18.2Last 10 Net Efficiency-6.6
71.0Tempo67.7
48.8%Effective FG%49.9%
19.2%Turnover Rate17.8%
23.6%Offensive Rebound %29.7%
31.5%Free Throw Rate36.8%
-17.3Average Margin0.7
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ
DePaul HAS THE EDGE
WIN PROBABILITY95.0%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
10–1
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMDePaul holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (48.4–26.6), offensive efficiency (103.7–96.0), defensive efficiency (102.7–120.4), net efficiency (1.0–-24.4).
Gardner-Webb COUNTERS WITHstrength of schedule (3.3–2.0).