UT Arlington

18-14

GAME THAT MATTERSAT

81.7%UT Arlington

18.3%Evansville

MMH WIN PROBABILITY

MODEL SPREADUT Arlington -9.0

PROJECTED TOTAL139.6

MODEL MONEYLINEUT Arlington -446

Evansville

7-25

MMH MODEL PROJECTION

Projected ScoreUT Arlington 74

Projected Total139.6

Projected ScoreEvansville 65

Team Comparison

UT ArlingtonMetricEvansville

49.6MMH Power Index31.6

102.7Offensive Efficiency98.5

97.9Defensive Efficiency112.4

4.8Net Efficiency-13.9

-0.8Strength of Schedule1.8

-3.9Last 10 Net Efficiency-23.0

68.1Tempo68.0

48.5%Effective FG%50.0%

20.4%Turnover Rate18.9%

36.0%Offensive Rebound %22.2%

43.7%Free Throw Rate30.8%

3.3Average Margin-9.5

MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE

MODEL READ

UT Arlington HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY81.7%

STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE

8–3

MMH comparison metrics

WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMUT Arlington holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (49.6–31.6), offensive efficiency (102.7–98.5), defensive efficiency (97.9–112.4), net efficiency (4.8–-13.9).

Evansville COUNTERS WITHstrength of schedule (1.8–-0.8), shooting efficiency (50.0–48.5), ball security (18.9–20.4).

Final

UT Arlington

84—76

Evansville

UT Arlington by 8 • 68.6 estimated possessions

Team Stats

UT ArlingtonTEAM STATEvansville

28-45FG24-52

62.0%FG%46.0%

8-163PT6-19

50.0%3PT%32.0%

20-24FT22-31

83.0%FT%71.0%

35Rebounds17

10Offensive Rebounds9

15Assists14

21Turnovers12

8Steals7

1Blocks4

25Fouls21

Player Box Score

UT Arlington

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Raysean Seamster	F	29	8-13	2-4	1-1	9	4	1	0	19
Tyran Mason	G	22	8-10	3-4	0-2	4	1	3	0	19
Cash Chavis	G	22	2-4	0-0	5-6	0	3	0	0	9
Marcell McCreary	G	30	1-6	0-2	5-6	1	2	1	0	7
Cameron Jackson	F	23	2-2	0-0	2-2	3	1	1	1	6
Marcus Rigsby Jr.	G	16	2-3	2-3	0-0	3	0	0	0	6
Amari Reed	F	14	2-2	0-0	2-2	2	0	0	0	6
Bahsil Laster	G	9	1-1	0-0	3-3	1	0	2	0	5
Jayden Smoot	G	20	1-2	0-1	2-2	4	0	0	0	4
Jordan Lowery	G	14	1-2	1-2	0-0	2	4	0	0	3
Miles Goodman	F	1	0-0	0-0	0-0	0	0	0	0	0

Evansville

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Connor Turnbull	F	22	9-15	0-1	2-4	5	0	1	1	20
Keishon Porter	G	27	4-9	1-4	9-13	0	3	4	0	18
Joshua Hughes	F	35	2-6	1-1	6-7	4	2	1	1	11
Leif Moeller	G	38	3-11	1-6	2-2	0	6	0	0	9
Alex Hemenway	G	33	3-5	2-4	0-0	3	0	0	0	8
Bryce Quinet	G	17	1-3	1-3	1-3	0	2	0	0	4
James Dyson-Merwe	F	10	2-2	0-0	0-0	1	0	0	0	4
AJ Casey	F	14	0-0	0-0	2-2	1	1	1	2	2
Trent Hundley	F	4	0-1	0-0	0-0	0	0	0	0	0

Advanced Game Stats

68.6Possessions68.6

122.4Offensive Efficiency110.8

110.8Defensive Efficiency122.4

11.7Net Efficiency-11.7

71.1%Effective FG%51.9%

74.5%True Shooting %57.0%

31.2%Turnover Rate17.2%

53.3%Free Throw Rate59.6%

35.6%3-Point Rate36.5%

0.71Assist / Turnover1.17

Game Summary

UT Arlington won by 8 points. The game played at approximately 68.6 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Net Efficiency, Effective FG%, True Shooting %.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.