New Orleans logo

New Orleans

16-18
GAME THAT MATTERSAT
61.8%New Orleans
38.2%Pepperdine
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADNew Orleans -2.1
PROJECTED TOTAL155.2
MODEL MONEYLINENew Orleans -162
Pepperdine logo

Pepperdine

9-23
MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreNew Orleans 79
Projected Total155.2
Projected ScorePepperdine 77

Team Comparison

47.1MMH Power Index38.2
107.0Offensive Efficiency103.2
109.6Defensive Efficiency113.6
-2.6Net Efficiency-10.4
0.2Strength of Schedule0.7
0.4Last 10 Net Efficiency-10.3
70.8Tempo70.0
50.5%Effective FG%48.7%
20.2%Turnover Rate18.3%
35.7%Offensive Rebound %31.1%
48.4%Free Throw Rate34.0%
-1.8Average Margin-7.3
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ

New Orleans HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY61.8%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
9–2
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMNew Orleans holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (47.1–38.2), offensive efficiency (107.0–103.2), defensive efficiency (109.6–113.6), net efficiency (-2.6–-10.4).
Pepperdine COUNTERS WITHstrength of schedule (0.7–0.2), ball security (18.3–20.2).
Final
New Orleans logo
New Orleans
79—90
Pepperdine logo
Pepperdine
Pepperdine by 11 • 73.9 estimated possessions

Team Stats

New OrleansTEAM STATPepperdine
25-62FG29-64
40.0%FG%45.0%
12-293PT7-25
41.0%3PT%28.0%
17-24FT25-28
71.0%FT%89.0%
40Rebounds35
15Offensive Rebounds11
14Assists23
17Turnovers6
5Steals6
5Blocks3
21Fouls21

Player Box Score

New Orleans
PlayerPosMinFG3PTFTREBASTSTLBLKTOPFPTS
Coleton BensonG364-134-105-536100017
Panagiotis PagonisF325-103-64-552000017
Jakevion BuckleyG345-131-64-655300015
Churchill AbassC174-60-01-14002009
MJ ThomasF302-80-02-314102006
Enzo BoudoumaF142-42-30-22000006
Kedrick OsbyF111-31-10-01000003
Irish CoquiaG71-21-20-00000003
Jamal Chretien IIG91-20-10-00000002
TJ CopeG80-10-01-20011001
Mathok MajokC20-00-00-01000000
Pepperdine
PlayerPosMinFG3PTFTREBASTSTLBLKTOPFPTS
Javon CooleyG355-131-712-1273200023
Danilo DožicC386-134-75-621100021
Styles PhippsG375-90-14-6511100014
Luka VudragovicG174-102-80-011000010
Yonatan LevyF173-40-02-23201008
Pavle StošicF172-50-12-26012006
Stefan CicicC62-30-00-02000004
Aaron ClarkG221-50-10-02300002
Nikola RadovanovicF21-10-00-02000002
Vladimir SudarF50-00-00-00110000
David MagerG40-10-00-00100000

Advanced Game Stats

73.9Possessions73.9
106.9Offensive Efficiency121.8
121.8Defensive Efficiency106.9
-14.9Net Efficiency14.9
50.0%Effective FG%50.8%
53.8%True Shooting %58.2%
22.5%Turnover Rate8.3%
38.7%Free Throw Rate43.8%
46.8%3-Point Rate39.1%
0.82Assist / Turnover3.83
Game Summary
Pepperdine won by 11 points. The game played at approximately 73.9 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Net Efficiency, Offensive Efficiency, Defensive Efficiency.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.