
Louisiana
11-22GAME THAT MATTERSAT
5.7%Louisiana
94.3%Stanford
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADStanford -17.7
PROJECTED TOTAL141.5
MODEL MONEYLINEStanford -1654

Stanford
20-13MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreLouisiana 62
Projected Total141.5
Projected ScoreStanford 80
Team Comparison
38.6MMH Power Index59.2
99.3Offensive Efficiency111.6
110.2Defensive Efficiency107.1
-10.9Net Efficiency4.5
1.5Strength of Schedule5.2
-9.0Last 10 Net Efficiency7.4
64.1Tempo68.1
47.1%Effective FG%51.9%
16.8%Turnover Rate15.5%
28.2%Offensive Rebound %32.4%
29.5%Free Throw Rate37.2%
-7.0Average Margin3.0
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ
Stanford HAS THE EDGE
WIN PROBABILITY94.3%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
11–0
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMStanford holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (59.2–38.6), offensive efficiency (111.6–99.3), defensive efficiency (107.1–110.2), net efficiency (4.5–-10.9).