
Harvard
17-12GAME THAT MATTERSAT
65.4%Harvard
34.6%Penn State
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADHarvard -3.7
PROJECTED TOTAL145.5
MODEL MONEYLINEHarvard -189

Penn State
12-20MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreHarvard 75
Projected Total145.5
Projected ScorePenn State 71
Team Comparison
52.6MMH Power Index42.3
108.1Offensive Efficiency109.2
102.9Defensive Efficiency117.6
5.2Net Efficiency-8.4
-0.1Strength of Schedule5.3
8.3Last 10 Net Efficiency-20.8
64.8Tempo67.5
53.4%Effective FG%53.4%
17.2%Turnover Rate15.6%
26.3%Offensive Rebound %25.6%
27.9%Free Throw Rate34.6%
3.4Average Margin-5.7
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ
Harvard HAS THE EDGE
WIN PROBABILITY65.4%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
6–4
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMHarvard holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (52.6–42.3), defensive efficiency (102.9–117.6), net efficiency (5.2–-8.4), recent form (8.3–-20.8).
Penn State COUNTERS WITHoffensive efficiency (109.2–108.1), strength of schedule (5.3–-0.1), ball security (15.6–17.2).