Harvard logo

Harvard

17-12
GAME THAT MATTERSAT
65.4%Harvard
34.6%Penn State
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADHarvard -3.7
PROJECTED TOTAL145.5
MODEL MONEYLINEHarvard -189
Penn State logo

Penn State

12-20
MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreHarvard 75
Projected Total145.5
Projected ScorePenn State 71

Team Comparison

52.6MMH Power Index42.3
108.1Offensive Efficiency109.2
102.9Defensive Efficiency117.6
5.2Net Efficiency-8.4
-0.1Strength of Schedule5.3
8.3Last 10 Net Efficiency-20.8
64.8Tempo67.5
53.4%Effective FG%53.4%
17.2%Turnover Rate15.6%
26.3%Offensive Rebound %25.6%
27.9%Free Throw Rate34.6%
3.4Average Margin-5.7
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ

Harvard HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY65.4%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
6–4
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMHarvard holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (52.6–42.3), defensive efficiency (102.9–117.6), net efficiency (5.2–-8.4), recent form (8.3–-20.8).
Penn State COUNTERS WITHoffensive efficiency (109.2–108.1), strength of schedule (5.3–-0.1), ball security (15.6–17.2).
Final
Harvard logo
Harvard
80—84
Penn State logo
Penn State
Penn State by 4 • 63.9 estimated possessions

Team Stats

HarvardTEAM STATPenn State
30-57FG31-57
53.0%FG%54.0%
12-273PT5-19
44.0%3PT%26.0%
8-8FT17-25
100.0%FT%68.0%
25Rebounds28
9Offensive Rebounds13
21Assists12
13Turnovers7
4Steals9
3Blocks—
18Fouls12

Player Box Score

Harvard
PlayerPosMinFG3PTFTREBASTSTLBLKTOPFPTS
Chandler PiggeG356-113-56-659000021
Thomas Batties IIIF346-125-70-036010017
Ben EisendrathG376-71-22-212110015
Tey BarbourG375-92-50-071110012
Ryan SullivanF73-30-00-02010006
Xavier NesbittG21-11-10-01000003
Robert HintonG171-70-50-01000002
Frankie ManninoG151-10-00-01300002
Luca Ace-NasteskiF71-30-00-01010002
Kenan ParrishF90-30-20-01000000
Penn State
PlayerPosMinFG3PTFTREBASTSTLBLKTOPFPTS
Kayden MingoG318-181-77-723100024
Josh ReedF274-50-16-1050300014
Freddie Dilione VG275-101-12-222000013
Melih TuncaG294-60-12-226300010
Ivan JuricF303-31-10-49000007
Tibor MirticF153-30-00-00100006
Eli RiceG152-51-30-01020005
Dominick StewartG181-51-50-01000003
Saša CianiF81-20-00-03000002

Advanced Game Stats

63.9Possessions63.9
125.2Offensive Efficiency131.5
131.5Defensive Efficiency125.2
-6.3Net Efficiency6.3
63.2%Effective FG%58.8%
65.8%True Shooting %61.0%
20.1%Turnover Rate11.1%
14.0%Free Throw Rate43.9%
47.4%3-Point Rate33.3%
1.62Assist / Turnover1.71
Game Summary
Penn State won by 4 points. The game played at approximately 63.9 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Free Throw Rate, Net Efficiency, Turnover Rate.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.