
Hofstra
24-11GAME THAT MATTERSAT
60.5%Hofstra
39.5%Temple
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADHofstra -2.0
PROJECTED TOTAL143.9
MODEL MONEYLINEHofstra -153

Temple
16-16MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreHofstra 73
Projected Total143.9
Projected ScoreTemple 71
Team Comparison
59.3MMH Power Index50.9
114.0Offensive Efficiency112.2
100.9Defensive Efficiency107.4
13.1Net Efficiency4.8
-2.9Strength of Schedule-2.0
14.0Last 10 Net Efficiency-1.5
66.2Tempo65.9
52.2%Effective FG%51.1%
16.1%Turnover Rate13.7%
35.0%Offensive Rebound %28.8%
32.0%Free Throw Rate42.3%
8.7Average Margin3.2
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ
Hofstra HAS THE EDGE
WIN PROBABILITY60.5%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
8–3
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMHofstra holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (59.3–50.9), offensive efficiency (114.0–112.2), defensive efficiency (100.9–107.4), net efficiency (13.1–4.8).
Temple COUNTERS WITHstrength of schedule (-2.0–-2.9), ball security (13.7–16.1), free throw rate (42.3–32.0).