
Wyoming
18-15GAME THAT MATTERSAT
37.5%Wyoming
62.5%Sam Houston
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADSam Houston -4.8
PROJECTED TOTAL156.5
MODEL MONEYLINESam Houston -167

Sam Houston
22-12MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreWyoming 76
Projected Total156.5
Projected ScoreSam Houston 81
Team Comparison
56.1MMH Power Index56.1
113.4Offensive Efficiency115.5
107.7Defensive Efficiency105.5
5.7Net Efficiency10.0
2.2Strength of Schedule-2.2
1.4Last 10 Net Efficiency3.2
67.8Tempo71.2
52.2%Effective FG%53.2%
16.2%Turnover Rate16.6%
34.6%Offensive Rebound %37.4%
36.7%Free Throw Rate34.8%
3.9Average Margin7.1
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ
Sam Houston HAS THE EDGE
WIN PROBABILITY62.5%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
7–3
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMSam Houston holds the advantage in offensive efficiency (115.5–113.4), defensive efficiency (105.5–107.7), net efficiency (10.0–5.7), recent form (3.2–1.4).
Wyoming COUNTERS WITHstrength of schedule (2.2–-2.2), ball security (16.2–16.6), free throw rate (36.7–34.8).