
Colgate
18-15GAME THAT MATTERSAT
21.0%Colgate
79.0%Cornell
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADCornell -8.8
PROJECTED TOTAL166.0
MODEL MONEYLINECornell -376

Cornell
15-13MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreColgate 79
Projected Total166.0
Projected ScoreCornell 87
Team Comparison
48.8MMH Power Index56.1
111.7Offensive Efficiency121.5
109.0Defensive Efficiency114.6
2.7Net Efficiency6.9
-2.0Strength of Schedule-1.1
-0.3Last 10 Net Efficiency7.6
68.4Tempo72.8
54.5%Effective FG%60.1%
14.8%Turnover Rate16.0%
26.9%Offensive Rebound %31.1%
30.0%Free Throw Rate29.7%
1.8Average Margin5.1
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ
Cornell HAS THE EDGE
WIN PROBABILITY79.0%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
8–3
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMCornell holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (56.1–48.8), offensive efficiency (121.5–111.7), net efficiency (6.9–2.7), strength of schedule (-1.1–-2.0).
Colgate COUNTERS WITHdefensive efficiency (109.0–114.6), ball security (14.8–16.0), free throw rate (30.0–29.7).