
UNC Greensboro
15-19GAME THAT MATTERSAT
25.6%UNC Greensboro
74.4%Queens University
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADQueens University -7.7
PROJECTED TOTAL168.9
MODEL MONEYLINEQueens University -291

Queens University
21-14MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreUNC Greensboro 81
Projected Total168.9
Projected ScoreQueens University 88
Team Comparison
46.7MMH Power Index51.7
112.6Offensive Efficiency118.4
115.3Defensive Efficiency117.0
-2.7Net Efficiency1.4
-1.9Strength of Schedule0.1
2.2Last 10 Net Efficiency1.5
69.8Tempo71.4
52.8%Effective FG%56.6%
14.6%Turnover Rate14.8%
28.7%Offensive Rebound %29.6%
41.7%Free Throw Rate37.6%
-1.9Average Margin0.9
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ
Queens University HAS THE EDGE
WIN PROBABILITY74.4%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
7–4
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMQueens University holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (51.7–46.7), offensive efficiency (118.4–112.6), net efficiency (1.4–-2.7), strength of schedule (0.1–-1.9).
UNC Greensboro COUNTERS WITHdefensive efficiency (115.3–117.0), recent form (2.2–1.5), ball security (14.6–14.8).