
Long Island University
24-11GAME THAT MATTERSAT
37.3%Long Island University
62.7%Fordham
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADFordham -5.1
PROJECTED TOTAL139.9
MODEL MONEYLINEFordham -168

Fordham
17-15MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreLong Island University 67
Projected Total139.9
Projected ScoreFordham 73
Team Comparison
50.2MMH Power Index50.3
107.6Offensive Efficiency105.9
104.8Defensive Efficiency99.3
2.8Net Efficiency6.6
-1.3Strength of Schedule-2.4
4.1Last 10 Net Efficiency-0.9
68.5Tempo65.9
53.0%Effective FG%50.0%
18.9%Turnover Rate17.3%
33.6%Offensive Rebound %34.5%
34.9%Free Throw Rate26.9%
1.9Average Margin4.4
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ
Fordham HAS THE EDGE
WIN PROBABILITY62.7%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
6–5
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMFordham holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (50.3–50.2), defensive efficiency (99.3–104.8), net efficiency (6.6–2.8), ball security (17.3–18.9).
Long Island University COUNTERS WITHoffensive efficiency (107.6–105.9), strength of schedule (-1.3–-2.4), recent form (4.1–-0.9).