
Tarleton State
14-18GAME THAT MATTERSAT
36.2%Tarleton State
63.8%Rice
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADRice -3.7
PROJECTED TOTAL149.9
MODEL MONEYLINERice -176

Rice
13-18MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreTarleton State 73
Projected Total149.9
Projected ScoreRice 77
Team Comparison
44.6MMH Power Index45.1
103.2Offensive Efficiency108.3
101.6Defensive Efficiency109.2
1.6Net Efficiency-0.9
-2.3Strength of Schedule-2.2
-6.7Last 10 Net Efficiency-4.3
72.2Tempo68.3
49.0%Effective FG%49.7%
19.9%Turnover Rate17.8%
31.8%Offensive Rebound %35.7%
42.8%Free Throw Rate34.7%
1.1Average Margin-0.6
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ
Rice HAS THE EDGE
WIN PROBABILITY63.8%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
7–4
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMRice holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (45.1–44.6), offensive efficiency (108.3–103.2), strength of schedule (-2.2–-2.3), recent form (-4.3–-6.7).
Tarleton State COUNTERS WITHdefensive efficiency (101.6–109.2), net efficiency (1.6–-0.9), free throw rate (42.8–34.7).