
Central Connecticut
18-12GAME THAT MATTERSAT
33.7%Central Connecticut
66.3%Rutgers
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADRutgers -3.4
PROJECTED TOTAL146.2
MODEL MONEYLINERutgers -197

Rutgers
13-20MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreCentral Connecticut 71
Projected Total146.2
Projected ScoreRutgers 75
Team Comparison
44.4MMH Power Index45.9
111.4Offensive Efficiency104.2
107.0Defensive Efficiency112.2
4.4Net Efficiency-8.0
-7.7Strength of Schedule3.9
-0.5Last 10 Net Efficiency-1.6
66.3Tempo67.4
54.0%Effective FG%47.4%
15.9%Turnover Rate15.0%
28.2%Offensive Rebound %29.2%
31.3%Free Throw Rate36.3%
2.9Average Margin-5.4
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ
Central Connecticut HAS THE EDGE
WIN PROBABILITY66.3%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
6–5
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMCentral Connecticut holds the advantage in offensive efficiency (111.4–104.2), defensive efficiency (107.0–112.2), net efficiency (4.4–-8.0), recent form (-0.5–-1.6).
Rutgers COUNTERS WITHMMH Power Index (45.9–44.4), strength of schedule (3.9–-7.7), ball security (15.0–15.9).