South Alabama

21-12

GAME THAT MATTERSAT

24.6%South Alabama

75.4%UAB

MMH WIN PROBABILITY

MODEL SPREADUAB -7.9

PROJECTED TOTAL150.4

MODEL MONEYLINEUAB -307

UAB

20-12

MMH MODEL PROJECTION

Projected ScoreSouth Alabama 71

Projected Total150.4

Projected ScoreUAB 79

Team Comparison

South AlabamaMetricUAB

51.4MMH Power Index56.9

110.3Offensive Efficiency110.5

103.9Defensive Efficiency102.9

6.4Net Efficiency7.6

-3.7Strength of Schedule0.4

3.4Last 10 Net Efficiency2.9

67.4Tempo71.7

53.2%Effective FG%48.8%

12.8%Turnover Rate12.4%

24.9%Offensive Rebound %32.7%

39.8%Free Throw Rate36.9%

4.3Average Margin5.4

MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE

MODEL READ

UAB HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY75.4%

STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE

8–3

MMH comparison metrics

WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMUAB holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (56.9–51.4), offensive efficiency (110.5–110.3), defensive efficiency (102.9–103.9), net efficiency (7.6–6.4).

South Alabama COUNTERS WITHrecent form (3.4–2.9), shooting efficiency (53.2–48.8), free throw rate (39.8–36.9).

Final

South Alabama

72—80

UAB

UAB by 8 • 63.9 estimated possessions

Team Stats

South AlabamaTEAM STATUAB

25-53FG28-61

47.0%FG%46.0%

6-193PT11-33

32.0%3PT%33.0%

16-27FT13-21

59.0%FT%62.0%

29Rebounds42

6Offensive Rebounds15

12Assists25

3Turnovers9

8Steals1

—Blocks3

15Fouls19

Player Box Score

South Alabama

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	PTS
Chaze Harris	G	36	10-17	0-0	5-10	4	4	1	25
Adam Olsen	F	37	5-12	4-10	4-4	2	1	0	18
Peyton Law	F	25	4-6	0-0	1-2	4	0	1	9
Randy Brady	F	32	2-3	1-1	2-2	8	0	2	7
Brian Hawthorne	G	25	2-6	0-2	3-5	4	4	3	7
Stephen Williams	F	14	1-1	0-0	1-2	3	0	0	3
JJ Wheat	G	8	1-2	1-1	0-2	0	0	0	3
Jayden Cooper	G	12	0-4	0-3	0-0	0	2	1	0
Hantz Louis-Jeune	G	10	0-2	0-2	0-0	1	1	0	0
John Broom	G	1	0-0	0-0	0-0	0	0	0	0

UAB

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Jacob Meyer	G	30	9-18	6-12	0-0	2	4	0	0	24
Daniel Rivera	F	34	6-9	0-0	1-1	8	0	0	0	13
Ahmad Robinson	G	30	4-10	4-9	0-0	4	5	0	0	12
KyeRon Lindsay-Martin	F	27	5-7	0-0	1-5	8	0	0	3	11
Chance Westry	G	35	2-9	0-5	6-9	5	11	1	0	10
Evan Chatman	F	19	1-1	0-0	5-6	12	2	0	0	7
Dayjaun Anderson	G	10	1-4	1-4	0-0	0	1	0	0	3
Salim London	G	10	0-2	0-2	0-0	1	2	0	0	0
Quaran McPherson	G	5	0-1	0-1	0-0	0	0	0	0	0

Advanced Game Stats

63.9Possessions63.9

112.7Offensive Efficiency125.2

125.2Defensive Efficiency112.7

-12.5Net Efficiency12.5

52.8%Effective FG%54.9%

54.7%True Shooting %56.4%

4.8%Turnover Rate13.9%

50.9%Free Throw Rate34.4%

35.8%3-Point Rate54.1%

4.00Assist / Turnover2.78

Game Summary

UAB won by 8 points. The game played at approximately 63.9 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Net Efficiency, Free Throw Rate, Offensive Efficiency.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.