
Austin Peay
22-9GAME THAT MATTERSAT
16.5%Austin Peay
83.5%Tulsa
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADTulsa -10.7
PROJECTED TOTAL160.4
MODEL MONEYLINETulsa -506

Tulsa
30-8MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreAustin Peay 75
Projected Total160.4
Projected ScoreTulsa 86
Team Comparison
54.8MMH Power Index64.8
115.0Offensive Efficiency121.1
103.1Defensive Efficiency104.8
11.9Net Efficiency16.3
-5.8Strength of Schedule0.0
8.1Last 10 Net Efficiency10.3
71.0Tempo70.2
53.9%Effective FG%55.4%
15.3%Turnover Rate15.4%
30.3%Offensive Rebound %33.8%
39.0%Free Throw Rate42.4%
8.4Average Margin11.5
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ
Tulsa HAS THE EDGE
WIN PROBABILITY83.5%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
9–2
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMTulsa holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (64.8–54.8), offensive efficiency (121.1–115.0), net efficiency (16.3–11.9), strength of schedule (0.0–-5.8).
Austin Peay COUNTERS WITHdefensive efficiency (103.1–104.8), ball security (15.3–15.4).