Manhattan logo

Manhattan

12-20
GAME THAT MATTERSAT
7.0%Manhattan
93.0%Texas A&M
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADTexas A&M -17.6
PROJECTED TOTAL157.0
MODEL MONEYLINETexas A&M -1329
Texas A&M logo

Texas A&M

20-12
MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreManhattan 70
Projected Total157.0
Projected ScoreTexas A&M 87

Team Comparison

39.3MMH Power Index58
107.1Offensive Efficiency116.1
114.2Defensive Efficiency108.4
-7.1Net Efficiency7.7
-3.6Strength of Schedule4.8
-3.5Last 10 Net Efficiency-7.2
69.1Tempo69.1
48.5%Effective FG%53.5%
15.4%Turnover Rate14.8%
29.8%Offensive Rebound %31.7%
34.8%Free Throw Rate37.5%
-4.9Average Margin5.3
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ

Texas A&M HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY93.0%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
10–1
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMTexas A&M holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (58.0–39.3), offensive efficiency (116.1–107.1), defensive efficiency (108.4–114.2), net efficiency (7.7–-7.1).
Manhattan COUNTERS WITHrecent form (-3.5–-7.2).
Final
Manhattan logo
Manhattan
68—109
Texas A&M logo
Texas A&M
Texas A&M by 41 • 74.6 estimated possessions

Team Stats

ManhattanTEAM STATTexas A&M
24-55FG39-67
44.0%FG%58.0%
9-203PT18-37
45.0%3PT%49.0%
11-19FT13-17
58.0%FT%76.0%
28Rebounds36
7Offensive Rebounds7
14Assists32
16Turnovers8
4Steals7
1Blocks3
14Fouls20

Player Box Score

Manhattan
PlayerPosMinFG3PTFTREBASTSTLBLKTOPFPTS
Terrance JonesG254-83-32-222000013
Marko LjubicicF244-63-50-010000011
Anthony IsaacF244-90-12-560000010
Devin DinkinsG333-71-20-02610007
Fraser RoxburghF303-100-31-26210007
Jaden WinstonG191-51-24-43010007
Quron ElliottG183-51-20-20310007
Erik Oliver-BushG212-30-12-21101006
Asier MiguelG20-00-00-00000000
Omari MooreG20-20-10-20000000
Michael LawlorF10-00-00-00000000
Jackson DelaneyG10-00-00-01000000
Texas A&M
PlayerPosMinFG3PTFTREBASTSTLBLKTOPFPTS
Rubén DominguezG2810-1410-140-052100030
Marcus HillG218-112-41-132000019
Rylan GriffenG245-84-73-416100017
Jacari LaneG215-82-40-007000012
Rashaun AgeeF203-40-13-410300009
Jamie VinsonF163-70-21-15300007
Josh HollowayG212-50-12-32620006
Federiko FederikoF122-20-01-21002005
Zach ClemenceF191-40-20-04110002
Jeremiah GreenG20-00-02-21000002
Ali DibbaG70-10-00-01211000
Mackenzie MgbakoF40-20-10-01010000
Noah ShelbyG30-10-10-00000000
Chris McDermottF20-00-00-01000000

Advanced Game Stats

74.6Possessions74.6
91.2Offensive Efficiency146.1
146.1Defensive Efficiency91.2
-55.0Net Efficiency55.0
51.8%Effective FG%71.6%
53.1%True Shooting %72.6%
21.9%Turnover Rate10.5%
34.5%Free Throw Rate25.4%
36.4%3-Point Rate55.2%
0.88Assist / Turnover4.00
Game Summary
Texas A&M won by 41 points. The game played at approximately 74.6 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Net Efficiency, Offensive Efficiency, Defensive Efficiency.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.