Texas Tech

23-11

GAME THAT MATTERSAT

20.9%Texas Tech

79.1%Purdue

MMH WIN PROBABILITY

MODEL SPREADPurdue -8.6

PROJECTED TOTAL155.4

MODEL MONEYLINEPurdue -378

Purdue

30-9

MMH MODEL PROJECTION

Projected ScoreTexas Tech 73

Projected Total155.4

Projected ScorePurdue 82

Team Comparison

Texas TechMetricPurdue

65.8MMH Power Index73.2

117.8Offensive Efficiency124.8

107.2Defensive Efficiency107.8

10.6Net Efficiency17.0

9.4Strength of Schedule7.6

0.9Last 10 Net Efficiency11.8

68.1Tempo65.4

56.4%Effective FG%57.8%

15.8%Turnover Rate13.7%

32.6%Offensive Rebound %36.2%

28.2%Free Throw Rate29.1%

7.2Average Margin11.1

MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE

MODEL READ

Purdue HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY79.1%

STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE

9–2

MMH comparison metrics

WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMPurdue holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (73.2–65.8), offensive efficiency (124.8–117.8), net efficiency (17.0–10.6), recent form (11.8–0.9).

Texas Tech COUNTERS WITHdefensive efficiency (107.2–107.8), strength of schedule (9.4–7.6).

Final

Texas Tech

56—86

Purdue

Purdue by 30 • 66.4 estimated possessions

Team Stats

Texas TechTEAM STATPurdue

20-60FG34-58

33.0%FG%59.0%

8-343PT8-14

24.0%3PT%57.0%

8-14FT10-15

57.0%FT%67.0%

25Rebounds43

9Offensive Rebounds10

8Assists19

9Turnovers11

7Steals1

3Blocks2

14Fouls15

Player Box Score

Texas Tech

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
JT Toppin	F	36	6-13	0-3	3-7	8	2	2	1	15
Christian Anderson	G	37	5-15	3-10	0-0	2	1	1	0	13
Donovan Atwell	G	22	3-9	3-9	0-0	1	0	1	0	9
Jaylen Petty	G	34	2-10	1-8	0-0	3	4	0	0	5
Luke Bamgboye	F	17	1-3	0-0	3-3	2	0	0	1	5
Leon Horner	G	11	2-6	0-0	1-2	5	0	1	1	5
Nolan Groves	G	9	1-2	1-2	1-2	0	0	1	0	4
Tyeree Bryan	G	16	0-2	0-2	0-0	1	0	0	0	0
LeJuan Watts	F	13	0-0	0-0	0-0	2	1	1	0	0
Marial Akuentok	F	4	0-0	0-0	0-0	0	0	0	0	0
Jack Francis	G	1	0-0	0-0	0-0	0	0	0	0	0

Purdue

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Oscar Cluff	C	21	6-8	0-0	3-4	15	1	0	0	15
Trey Kaufman-Renn	F	20	6-9	0-0	0-1	6	0	0	0	12
Omer Mayer	G	20	5-8	1-3	0-0	0	2	0	0	11
Daniel Jacobsen	C	19	4-4	1-1	2-2	8	2	0	2	11
Braden Smith	G	28	4-7	2-2	0-0	1	7	0	0	10
C.J. Cox	G	25	4-8	2-3	0-0	3	1	1	0	10
Fletcher Loyer	G	24	3-8	2-5	2-2	2	2	0	0	10
Jack Benter	G	18	1-1	0-0	2-4	5	1	0	0	4
Gicarri Harris	G	17	1-4	0-0	0-0	0	2	0	0	2
Aaron Fine	G	4	0-1	0-0	1-2	0	1	0	0	1
Jack Lusk	G	2	0-0	0-0	0-0	0	0	0	0	0
Jace Rayl	G	2	0-0	0-0	0-0	0	0	0	0	0

Advanced Game Stats

66.4Possessions66.4

84.3Offensive Efficiency129.5

129.5Defensive Efficiency84.3

-45.2Net Efficiency45.2

40.0%Effective FG%65.5%

42.0%True Shooting %66.0%

13.5%Turnover Rate16.6%

23.3%Free Throw Rate25.9%

56.7%3-Point Rate24.1%

0.89Assist / Turnover1.73

Game Summary

Purdue won by 30 points. The game played at approximately 66.4 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Net Efficiency, Offensive Efficiency, Defensive Efficiency.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.