
Grambling
14-19GAME THAT MATTERSAT
8.4%Grambling
91.6%California Baptist
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADCalifornia Baptist -15.0
PROJECTED TOTAL140.0
MODEL MONEYLINECalifornia Baptist -1090

California Baptist
25-9MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreGrambling 63
Projected Total140.0
Projected ScoreCalifornia Baptist 78
Team Comparison
41.4MMH Power Index58.3
100.7Offensive Efficiency106.5
100.4Defensive Efficiency99.0
0.3Net Efficiency7.5
-5.7Strength of Schedule1.8
-0.4Last 10 Net Efficiency11.0
69.9Tempo68.2
49.2%Effective FG%48.8%
20.9%Turnover Rate17.9%
30.4%Offensive Rebound %37.0%
42.2%Free Throw Rate37.0%
0.2Average Margin5.1
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ
California Baptist HAS THE EDGE
WIN PROBABILITY91.6%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
9–2
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMCalifornia Baptist holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (58.3–41.4), offensive efficiency (106.5–100.7), defensive efficiency (99.0–100.4), net efficiency (7.5–0.3).
Grambling COUNTERS WITHshooting efficiency (49.2–48.8), free throw rate (42.2–37.0).