
UT Martin
22-11GAME THAT MATTERSAT
60.0%UT Martin
40.0%Prairie View A&M
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADUT Martin -2.5
PROJECTED TOTAL144.0
MODEL MONEYLINEUT Martin -150

Prairie View A&M
19-18MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreUT Martin 73
Projected Total144.0
Projected ScorePrairie View A&M 71
Team Comparison
49.8MMH Power Index41.6
103.8Offensive Efficiency105.6
94.0Defensive Efficiency103.9
9.8Net Efficiency1.7
-4.8Strength of Schedule-9.8
-0.8Last 10 Net Efficiency4.4
67.2Tempo73.8
49.5%Effective FG%49.2%
21.4%Turnover Rate15.9%
37.9%Offensive Rebound %27.7%
37.5%Free Throw Rate42.9%
6.6Average Margin1.3
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ
UT Martin HAS THE EDGE
WIN PROBABILITY60.0%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
7–4
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMUT Martin holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (49.8–41.6), defensive efficiency (94.0–103.9), net efficiency (9.8–1.7), strength of schedule (-4.8–-9.8).
Prairie View A&M COUNTERS WITHoffensive efficiency (105.6–103.8), recent form (4.4–-0.8), ball security (15.9–21.4).