Western Carolina

15-16

GAME THAT MATTERSAT

51.5%Western Carolina

48.5%Lipscomb

MMH WIN PROBABILITY

MODEL SPREADLipscomb -1.7

PROJECTED TOTAL156.0

MODEL MONEYLINEWestern Carolina -106

Lipscomb

18-13

MMH MODEL PROJECTION

Projected ScoreWestern Carolina 77

Projected Total156.0

Projected ScoreLipscomb 79

Team Comparison

Western CarolinaMetricLipscomb

53MMH Power Index47.9

112.6Offensive Efficiency111.3

111.0Defensive Efficiency107.6

1.6Net Efficiency3.7

-0.9Strength of Schedule-2.5

13.1Last 10 Net Efficiency-1.0

69.7Tempo68.8

51.1%Effective FG%54.8%

16.4%Turnover Rate16.0%

36.1%Offensive Rebound %25.9%

30.8%Free Throw Rate26.5%

1.1Average Margin2.5

MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE

MODEL READ

Western Carolina HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY51.5%

STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE

6–5

MMH comparison metrics

WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMWestern Carolina holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (53.0–47.9), offensive efficiency (112.6–111.3), strength of schedule (-0.9–-2.5), recent form (13.1–-1.0).

Lipscomb COUNTERS WITHdefensive efficiency (107.6–111.0), net efficiency (3.7–1.6), shooting efficiency (54.8–51.1).

Final

Western Carolina

62—83

Lipscomb

Lipscomb by 21 • 74.5 estimated possessions

Team Stats

Western CarolinaTEAM STATLipscomb

24-55FG32-70

44.0%FG%46.0%

5-283PT16-37

18.0%3PT%43.0%

9-15FT3-6

60.0%FT%50.0%

35Rebounds39

5Offensive Rebounds10

6Assists23

18Turnovers11

8Steals14

6Blocks2

7Fouls14

Player Box Score

Western Carolina

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Julien Soumaoro	G	27	6-13	2-9	1-3	3	3	0	1	15
Tahlan Pettway	G	18	5-7	2-4	0-1	0	0	1	0	12
Cord Stansberry	G	25	3-6	0-3	4-4	3	1	1	0	10
Marcus Kell	F	27	2-11	1-6	1-2	3	0	0	1	6
Fischer Brown	G	14	3-5	0-2	0-0	1	0	1	0	6
Abdulai Fanta Kabba	C	22	2-2	0-0	1-2	9	0	2	4	5
Tidjiane Dioumassi	G	25	2-4	0-1	0-1	1	1	0	0	4
Justin Johnson	G	13	0-3	0-1	2-2	2	0	0	0	2
Samuel Dada	F	8	1-1	0-0	0-0	2	0	0	0	2
Tayeshaun Smith	F	11	0-2	0-1	0-0	1	0	1	0	0
Vernon Collins	F	10	0-1	0-1	0-0	5	1	2	0	0

Lipscomb

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Grant Asman	F	23	9-13	4-8	0-0	2	1	0	1	22
Ethan Duncan	G	20	6-11	6-10	0-0	5	1	1	0	18
Ross Candelino	G	21	4-11	4-8	0-0	5	2	2	0	12
Charlie Williams	C	23	3-7	0-1	0-0	1	1	3	0	6
Cole Middleton	F	17	3-7	0-2	0-2	5	4	0	0	6
Kennedy Okpara	F	16	2-5	1-1	0-0	2	0	0	1	5
Mateo Esmeraldo	G	23	2-6	0-3	0-0	3	7	5	0	4
Kellan Boylan	F	15	1-2	0-1	1-2	4	2	0	0	3
Luke Carter	G	2	1-1	1-1	0-0	0	0	0	0	3
Or Ashkenazi	F	22	0-2	0-1	2-2	5	4	3	0	2
Titas Sargiunas	F	18	1-5	0-1	0-0	2	1	0	0	2

Advanced Game Stats

74.5Possessions74.5

83.2Offensive Efficiency111.4

111.4Defensive Efficiency83.2

-28.2Net Efficiency28.2

48.2%Effective FG%57.1%

49.9%True Shooting %57.0%

24.0%Turnover Rate14.9%

27.3%Free Throw Rate8.6%

50.9%3-Point Rate52.9%

0.33Assist / Turnover2.09

Game Summary

Lipscomb won by 21 points. The game played at approximately 74.5 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Net Efficiency, Offensive Efficiency, Defensive Efficiency.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.