
UT Rio Grande Valley
19-14GAME THAT MATTERSAT
50.4%UT Rio Grande Valley
49.6%Missouri State
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADMissouri State -0.3
PROJECTED TOTAL148.3
MODEL MONEYLINEUT Rio Grande Valley -102

Missouri State
16-18MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreUT Rio Grande Valley 74
Projected Total148.3
Projected ScoreMissouri State 74
Team Comparison
55.8MMH Power Index51.1
112.6Offensive Efficiency110.5
103.1Defensive Efficiency108.4
9.5Net Efficiency2.1
-1.9Strength of Schedule0.5
12.3Last 10 Net Efficiency-2.1
67.4Tempo67.9
55.7%Effective FG%51.8%
17.9%Turnover Rate16.4%
29.2%Offensive Rebound %33.0%
29.6%Free Throw Rate42.9%
6.4Average Margin1.4
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ
UT Rio Grande Valley HAS THE EDGE
WIN PROBABILITY50.4%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
7–4
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMUT Rio Grande Valley holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (55.8–51.1), offensive efficiency (112.6–110.5), defensive efficiency (103.1–108.4), net efficiency (9.5–2.1).
Missouri State COUNTERS WITHstrength of schedule (0.5–-1.9), ball security (16.4–17.9), offensive rebounding (33.0–29.2).