UT Arlington

18-14

GAME THAT MATTERSAT

36.0%UT Arlington

64.0%Weber State

MMH WIN PROBABILITY

MODEL SPREADWeber State -4.1

PROJECTED TOTAL148.8

MODEL MONEYLINEWeber State -178

Weber State

16-16

MMH MODEL PROJECTION

Projected ScoreUT Arlington 72

Projected Total148.8

Projected ScoreWeber State 76

Team Comparison

UT ArlingtonMetricWeber State

49.6MMH Power Index50.2

102.7Offensive Efficiency113.6

97.9Defensive Efficiency108.2

4.8Net Efficiency5.4

-0.8Strength of Schedule-3.4

-3.9Last 10 Net Efficiency-1.8

68.1Tempo71.5

48.5%Effective FG%52.6%

20.4%Turnover Rate15.5%

36.0%Offensive Rebound %32.6%

43.7%Free Throw Rate38.3%

3.3Average Margin3.9

MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE

MODEL READ

Weber State HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY64.0%

STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE

7–4

MMH comparison metrics

WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMWeber State holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (50.2–49.6), offensive efficiency (113.6–102.7), net efficiency (5.4–4.8), recent form (-1.8–-3.9).

UT Arlington COUNTERS WITHdefensive efficiency (97.9–108.2), strength of schedule (-0.8–-3.4), offensive rebounding (36.0–32.6).

Final

UT Arlington

74—73

Weber State

UT Arlington by 1 • 66.4 estimated possessions

Team Stats

UT ArlingtonTEAM STATWeber State

29-57FG26-54

51.0%FG%48.0%

6-173PT6-18

35.0%3PT%33.0%

10-12FT15-17

83.0%FT%88.0%

30Rebounds29

8Offensive Rebounds7

11Assists8

12Turnovers11

6Steals5

3Blocks4

15Fouls13

Player Box Score

UT Arlington

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Marcell McCreary	G	33	6-11	2-4	6-6	4	1	1	1	20
Raysean Seamster	F	33	7-15	1-4	0-1	5	3	1	1	15
Jordan Lowery	G	13	4-5	1-1	1-2	0	0	0	0	10
Cameron Jackson	F	24	4-6	0-0	0-0	4	0	1	1	8
Cash Chavis	G	26	2-6	0-1	3-3	2	5	1	0	7
Jayden Smoot	G	20	2-3	1-2	0-0	4	0	0	0	5
Marcus Rigsby Jr.	G	22	1-3	1-3	0-0	4	1	0	0	3
Miles Goodman	F	12	1-4	0-2	0-0	1	0	1	0	2
Bahsil Laster	G	6	1-2	0-0	0-0	1	0	0	0	2
Amari Reed	F	4	1-2	0-0	0-0	1	0	1	0	2
Tyran Mason	G	7	0-0	0-0	0-0	0	1	0	0	0

Weber State

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Jace Whiting	G	33	5-7	1-2	2-2	5	2	0	0	13
Trevor Hennig	G	27	4-9	0-1	4-4	3	2	1	0	12
Nigel Burris	F	24	3-7	1-3	5-7	4	0	0	0	12
Viljami Vartiainen	G	26	4-11	2-7	0-0	2	1	0	0	10
Malek Gomma	F	21	4-6	1-1	0-0	3	0	0	2	9
Tijan Saine Jr.	G	29	3-6	0-1	2-2	1	2	0	0	8
Edwin Suarez Jr.	F	24	2-4	0-0	2-2	5	1	2	2	6
ArDarius Grayson	G	7	1-2	1-1	0-0	0	0	2	0	3
David Hansen	F	8	0-2	0-2	0-0	3	0	0	0	0
Duce Paschal	G	1	0-0	0-0	0-0	0	0	0	0	0

Advanced Game Stats

66.4Possessions66.4

111.4Offensive Efficiency109.9

109.9Defensive Efficiency111.4

1.5Net Efficiency-1.5

56.1%Effective FG%53.7%

59.0%True Shooting %58.8%

18.0%Turnover Rate16.6%

21.1%Free Throw Rate31.5%

29.8%3-Point Rate33.3%

0.92Assist / Turnover0.73

Game Summary

UT Arlington won by 1 points. The game played at approximately 66.4 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Free Throw Rate, Net Efficiency, Effective FG%.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.