Clemson

24-10

GAME THAT MATTERSAT

27.3%Clemson

72.7%Georgia

MMH WIN PROBABILITY

MODEL SPREADGeorgia -7.4

PROJECTED TOTAL154.9

MODEL MONEYLINEGeorgia -266

Georgia

22-11

MMH MODEL PROJECTION

Projected ScoreClemson 74

Projected Total154.9

Projected ScoreGeorgia 81

Team Comparison

ClemsonMetricGeorgia

59.9MMH Power Index64.1

112.6Offensive Efficiency119.7

101.4Defensive Efficiency106.9

11.2Net Efficiency12.8

4.6Strength of Schedule4.9

-4.7Last 10 Net Efficiency-2.7

63.6Tempo74.7

53.0%Effective FG%54.4%

14.0%Turnover Rate14.3%

27.0%Offensive Rebound %34.5%

38.1%Free Throw Rate37.6%

7.2Average Margin9.6

MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE

MODEL READ

Georgia HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY72.7%

STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE

8–3

MMH comparison metrics

WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMGeorgia holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (64.1–59.9), offensive efficiency (119.7–112.6), net efficiency (12.8–11.2), strength of schedule (4.9–4.6).

Clemson COUNTERS WITHdefensive efficiency (101.4–106.9), ball security (14.0–14.3), free throw rate (38.1–37.6).

Final

Clemson

97—94

Georgia

Clemson by 3 • 83.1 estimated possessions

Team Stats

ClemsonTEAM STATGeorgia

32-69FG32-66

46.0%FG%48.0%

11-253PT9-30

44.0%3PT%30.0%

22-29FT21-26

76.0%FT%81.0%

45Rebounds35

15Offensive Rebounds8

12Assists14

13Turnovers15

8Steals8

—Blocks5

23Fouls25

Player Box Score

Clemson

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	PTS
Jestin Porter	G	40	7-14	4-9	0-1	2	0	1	18
Dillon Hunter	G	35	4-6	2-2	6-6	7	1	2	16
Butta Johnson	G	23	4-8	1-3	4-4	1	1	0	13
RJ Godfrey	F	24	4-6	0-0	4-6	7	2	1	12
Carter Welling	F	22	5-10	1-2	0-0	5	2	1	11
Zac Foster	G	17	4-8	3-4	0-0	1	2	0	11
Jake Wahlin	F	26	1-4	0-2	4-6	4	0	1	6
Nick Davidson	F	22	1-8	0-1	4-6	9	2	1	6
Ace Buckner	G	14	2-5	0-2	0-0	6	2	1	4
Chase Thompson	F	2	0-0	0-0	0-0	0	0	0	0

Georgia

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Jeremiah Wilkinson	G	27	9-15	2-5	6-8	0	0	1	1	26
Blue Cain	G	36	5-9	3-6	6-6	7	3	3	0	19
Somtochukwu Cyril	C	23	4-4	0-0	3-4	5	0	1	2	11
Marcus Millender	G	25	2-7	1-5	2-2	0	6	1	0	7
Kanon Catchings	F	20	2-8	1-5	2-3	2	2	0	0	7
Jordan Ross	G	21	3-5	0-1	0-0	4	2	0	1	6
Justin Bailey	G	18	2-3	2-3	0-0	1	0	0	0	6
Dylan James	F	20	2-7	0-2	0-0	6	0	0	1	4
Justin Abson	F	16	2-3	0-0	0-1	5	1	2	0	4
Kareem Stagg	F	12	1-3	0-1	2-2	3	0	0	0	4
Jake Wilkins	F	7	0-2	0-2	0-0	0	0	0	0	0

Advanced Game Stats

83.1Possessions83.1

116.7Offensive Efficiency113.1

113.1Defensive Efficiency116.7

3.6Net Efficiency-3.6

54.3%Effective FG%55.3%

58.6%True Shooting %60.0%

16.1%Turnover Rate17.6%

42.0%Free Throw Rate39.4%

36.2%3-Point Rate45.5%

0.92Assist / Turnover0.93

Game Summary

Clemson won by 3 points. The game played at approximately 83.1 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Net Efficiency, Offensive Efficiency, Defensive Efficiency.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.