Binghamton

8-22

GAME THAT MATTERSAT

33.7%Binghamton

66.3%Canisius

MMH WIN PROBABILITY

MODEL SPREADCanisius -5.3

PROJECTED TOTAL134.1

MODEL MONEYLINECanisius -197

Canisius

10-21

MMH MODEL PROJECTION

Projected ScoreBinghamton 64

Projected Total134.1

Projected ScoreCanisius 70

Team Comparison

BinghamtonMetricCanisius

32.4MMH Power Index33.9

102.2Offensive Efficiency97.1

112.3Defensive Efficiency108.8

-10.1Net Efficiency-11.7

-6.0Strength of Schedule-1.8

-6.2Last 10 Net Efficiency-10.0

64.2Tempo64.8

51.3%Effective FG%46.8%

18.5%Turnover Rate19.6%

21.5%Offensive Rebound %29.1%

42.8%Free Throw Rate32.4%

-6.5Average Margin-7.5

MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE

MODEL READ

Binghamton HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY66.3%

STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE

7–4

MMH comparison metrics

WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMBinghamton holds the advantage in offensive efficiency (102.2–97.1), net efficiency (-10.1–-11.7), recent form (-6.2–-10.0), shooting efficiency (51.3–46.8).

Canisius COUNTERS WITHMMH Power Index (33.9–32.4), defensive efficiency (108.8–112.3), strength of schedule (-1.8–-6.0).

Final

Binghamton

66—75

Canisius

Canisius by 9 • 61.6 estimated possessions

Team Stats

BinghamtonTEAM STATCanisius

19-44FG24-49

43.0%FG%49.0%

3-213PT9-18

14.0%3PT%50.0%

25-32FT18-21

78.0%FT%86.0%

26Rebounds26

7Offensive Rebounds6

11Assists15

10Turnovers8

4Steals4

2Blocks2

15Fouls23

Player Box Score

Binghamton

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Demetrius Lilley	C	38	5-11	1-5	4-4	4	0	0	0	15
Jeremiah Quigley	G	31	5-11	0-2	5-7	4	6	1	0	15
Jackson Benigni	G	38	3-11	2-10	6-6	3	0	1	0	14
Zyier Beverly	F	33	5-5	0-0	3-6	2	2	1	1	13
Bryson Wilson	G	36	1-4	0-2	7-9	6	1	1	0	9
Ryan Richardson	G	15	0-2	0-2	0-0	1	1	0	1	0
Stephan Snagg	F	9	0-0	0-0	0-0	1	1	0	0	0

Canisius

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Kahlil Singleton	G	38	10-15	8-11	5-5	1	1	0	0	33
Bryan Ndjonga	F	29	6-12	1-2	0-0	5	2	0	0	13
Mike Evbagharu	G	37	5-9	0-1	2-3	7	2	2	1	12
Javante Edwards	G	29	2-7	0-3	4-5	0	7	0	1	8
Myles Wilmoth	F	20	1-1	0-0	2-2	5	2	1	0	4
Anthony Benard	G	7	0-3	0-1	2-2	1	0	0	0	2
Brendan Oliver	F	6	0-0	0-0	2-2	0	0	0	0	2
Max Jusianiec	G	25	0-1	0-0	1-2	4	1	1	0	1
Chris Kumu	G	6	0-1	0-0	0-0	0	0	0	0	0
King Ijeoma	F	2	0-0	0-0	0-0	0	0	0	0	0
Evan van der Plas	F	1	0-0	0-0	0-0	0	0	0	0	0

Advanced Game Stats

61.6Possessions61.6

107.1Offensive Efficiency121.8

121.8Defensive Efficiency107.1

-14.6Net Efficiency14.6

46.6%Effective FG%58.2%

55.7%True Shooting %63.6%

16.1%Turnover Rate13.1%

72.7%Free Throw Rate42.9%

47.7%3-Point Rate36.7%

1.10Assist / Turnover1.88

Game Summary

Canisius won by 9 points. The game played at approximately 61.6 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Free Throw Rate, Net Efficiency, Offensive Efficiency.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.