
Longwood
16-16GAME THAT MATTERSAT
25.8%Longwood
74.2%Columbia
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADColumbia -7.5
PROJECTED TOTAL152.2
MODEL MONEYLINEColumbia -288

Columbia
16-12MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreLongwood 72
Projected Total152.2
Projected ScoreColumbia 80
Team Comparison
47MMH Power Index51.9
108.1Offensive Efficiency112.4
103.0Defensive Efficiency105.2
5.1Net Efficiency7.2
-6.4Strength of Schedule-1.7
2.3Last 10 Net Efficiency-2.4
71.9Tempo68.2
51.4%Effective FG%54.4%
19.3%Turnover Rate19.1%
35.4%Offensive Rebound %37.3%
42.0%Free Throw Rate28.8%
3.6Average Margin5.0
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ
Columbia HAS THE EDGE
WIN PROBABILITY74.2%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
8–3
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMColumbia holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (51.9–47.0), offensive efficiency (112.4–108.1), net efficiency (7.2–5.1), strength of schedule (-1.7–-6.4).
Longwood COUNTERS WITHdefensive efficiency (103.0–105.2), recent form (2.3–-2.4), free throw rate (42.0–28.8).