
Queens University
21-14GAME THAT MATTERSAT
32.0%Queens University
68.0%Furman
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADFurman -6.8
PROJECTED TOTAL161.3
MODEL MONEYLINEFurman -212

Furman
22-13MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreQueens University 77
Projected Total161.3
Projected ScoreFurman 84
Team Comparison
51.7MMH Power Index53.9
118.4Offensive Efficiency113.3
117.0Defensive Efficiency105.1
1.4Net Efficiency8.2
0.1Strength of Schedule-1.8
1.5Last 10 Net Efficiency4.6
71.4Tempo67.4
56.6%Effective FG%55.4%
14.8%Turnover Rate17.7%
29.6%Offensive Rebound %31.7%
37.6%Free Throw Rate32.6%
0.9Average Margin5.5
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ
Furman HAS THE EDGE
WIN PROBABILITY68.0%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
6–5
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMFurman holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (53.9–51.7), defensive efficiency (105.1–117.0), net efficiency (8.2–1.4), recent form (4.6–1.5).
Queens University COUNTERS WITHoffensive efficiency (118.4–113.3), strength of schedule (0.1–-1.8), shooting efficiency (56.6–55.4).