
Bucknell
10-23GAME THAT MATTERSAT
6.7%Bucknell
93.3%Bowling Green
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADBowling Green -19.1
PROJECTED TOTAL149.9
MODEL MONEYLINEBowling Green -1393

Bowling Green
18-14MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreBucknell 65
Projected Total149.9
Projected ScoreBowling Green 84
Team Comparison
35.7MMH Power Index54.7
99.5Offensive Efficiency112.6
112.8Defensive Efficiency99.1
-13.3Net Efficiency13.5
2.0Strength of Schedule-4.7
-11.5Last 10 Net Efficiency1.4
67.7Tempo72.2
48.4%Effective FG%53.4%
19.0%Turnover Rate15.9%
26.6%Offensive Rebound %29.2%
30.7%Free Throw Rate38.7%
-8.9Average Margin9.8
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ
Bowling Green HAS THE EDGE
WIN PROBABILITY93.3%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
10–1
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMBowling Green holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (54.7–35.7), offensive efficiency (112.6–99.5), defensive efficiency (99.1–112.8), net efficiency (13.5–-13.3).
Bucknell COUNTERS WITHstrength of schedule (2.0–-4.7).