
East Texas A&M
11-21GAME THAT MATTERSAT
37.8%East Texas A&M
62.2%Fairleigh Dickinson
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADFairleigh Dickinson -4.2
PROJECTED TOTAL140.8
MODEL MONEYLINEFairleigh Dickinson -165

Fairleigh Dickinson
11-21MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreEast Texas A&M 68
Projected Total140.8
Projected ScoreFairleigh Dickinson 72
Team Comparison
38.4MMH Power Index38.3
101.2Offensive Efficiency103.8
107.5Defensive Efficiency108.4
-6.3Net Efficiency-4.6
-1.5Strength of Schedule-5.8
-9.1Last 10 Net Efficiency-4.7
69.3Tempo64.7
50.7%Effective FG%48.6%
18.7%Turnover Rate18.2%
26.3%Offensive Rebound %33.6%
31.9%Free Throw Rate33.1%
-4.3Average Margin-3.0
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ
Fairleigh Dickinson HAS THE EDGE
WIN PROBABILITY62.2%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
7–4
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMFairleigh Dickinson holds the advantage in offensive efficiency (103.8–101.2), net efficiency (-4.6–-6.3), recent form (-4.7–-9.1), ball security (18.2–18.7).
East Texas A&M COUNTERS WITHMMH Power Index (38.4–38.3), defensive efficiency (107.5–108.4), strength of schedule (-1.5–-5.8).