VMI logo

VMI

5-26
GAME THAT MATTERSAT
5.7%VMI
94.3%Buffalo
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADBuffalo -17.9
PROJECTED TOTAL152.9
MODEL MONEYLINEBuffalo -1654
Buffalo logo

Buffalo

17-15
MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreVMI 68
Projected Total152.9
Projected ScoreBuffalo 85

Team Comparison

29.1MMH Power Index49.7
105.1Offensive Efficiency114.9
117.4Defensive Efficiency112.2
-12.3Net Efficiency2.7
-5.4Strength of Schedule0.0
-21.9Last 10 Net Efficiency-5.9
66.2Tempo67.9
48.9%Effective FG%56.1%
14.7%Turnover Rate16.1%
26.4%Offensive Rebound %27.6%
29.9%Free Throw Rate40.4%
-8.2Average Margin1.8
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ

Buffalo HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY94.3%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
10–1
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMBuffalo holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (49.7–29.1), offensive efficiency (114.9–105.1), defensive efficiency (112.2–117.4), net efficiency (2.7–-12.3).
VMI COUNTERS WITHball security (14.7–16.1).
Final
VMI logo
VMI
70—78
Buffalo logo
Buffalo
Buffalo by 8 • 66.6 estimated possessions

Team Stats

VMITEAM STATBuffalo
24-64FG21-46
38.0%FG%46.0%
8-343PT8-21
24.0%3PT%38.0%
14-20FT28-37
70.0%FT%76.0%
35Rebounds36
15Offensive Rebounds9
8Assists11
8Turnovers12
5Steals6
1Blocks2
25Fouls17

Player Box Score

VMI
PlayerPosMinFG3PTFTREBASTSTLBLKTOPFPTS
TJ JohnsonF366-216-1810-1170100028
Tan YildizogluG255-91-40-010100011
Mario Tatum Jr.G244-91-32-531100011
Jaylen PazonG144-60-00-01000008
AJ ClarkG272-50-10-010311004
Walker AndrewsG132-50-30-01100004
Linus HolmstromG201-60-40-02110002
Kaden StuckeyF210-20-01-23000001
Cal ListonF170-10-11-21200001
Mason HagedornF30-00-00-00000000
Buffalo
PlayerPosMinFG3PTFTREBASTSTLBLKTOPFPTS
Daniel FreitagG391-41-414-1621110017
Noah BatchelorG355-73-52-251100015
Ryan SabolG374-144-101-233100013
Angelo BrizziG212-50-15-64110009
Ezra McKennaF204-60-00-010100008
Tim ObohC173-50-02-61021008
Derrick Talton Jr.G192-30-13-33400007
Mikhail PocknettF70-00-01-22000001
Kyle JonesG50-20-00-01000000

Advanced Game Stats

66.6Possessions66.6
105.1Offensive Efficiency117.1
117.1Defensive Efficiency105.1
-12.0Net Efficiency12.0
43.8%Effective FG%54.3%
47.6%True Shooting %61.3%
12.0%Turnover Rate18.0%
31.3%Free Throw Rate80.4%
53.1%3-Point Rate45.7%
1.00Assist / Turnover0.92
Game Summary
Buffalo won by 8 points. The game played at approximately 66.6 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Free Throw Rate, Net Efficiency, True Shooting %.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.