
Grambling
14-19GAME THAT MATTERSAT
38.1%Grambling
61.9%UC Riverside
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADUC Riverside -2.8
PROJECTED TOTAL146.6
MODEL MONEYLINEUC Riverside -162

UC Riverside
10-22MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreGrambling 72
Projected Total146.6
Projected ScoreUC Riverside 75
Team Comparison
41.4MMH Power Index41.2
100.7Offensive Efficiency103.1
100.4Defensive Efficiency110.1
0.3Net Efficiency-7.0
-5.7Strength of Schedule0.5
-0.4Last 10 Net Efficiency-5.1
69.9Tempo70.7
49.2%Effective FG%49.8%
20.9%Turnover Rate18.5%
30.4%Offensive Rebound %28.5%
42.2%Free Throw Rate35.2%
0.2Average Margin-4.9
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ
Grambling HAS THE EDGE
WIN PROBABILITY61.9%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
7–4
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMGrambling holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (41.4–41.2), defensive efficiency (100.4–110.1), net efficiency (0.3–-7.0), recent form (-0.4–-5.1).
UC Riverside COUNTERS WITHoffensive efficiency (103.1–100.7), strength of schedule (0.5–-5.7), shooting efficiency (49.8–49.2).