William & Mary

20-12

GAME THAT MATTERSAT

63.1%William & Mary

36.9%UTEP

MMH WIN PROBABILITY

MODEL SPREADWilliam & Mary -2.9

PROJECTED TOTAL153.5

MODEL MONEYLINEWilliam & Mary -171

UTEP

11-20

MMH MODEL PROJECTION

Projected ScoreWilliam & Mary 78

Projected Total153.5

Projected ScoreUTEP 75

Team Comparison

William & MaryMetricUTEP

53.8MMH Power Index44.4

112.5Offensive Efficiency102.6

105.2Defensive Efficiency107.1

7.3Net Efficiency-4.5

-1.5Strength of Schedule1.7

3.5Last 10 Net Efficiency-4.7

73.9Tempo67.6

55.3%Effective FG%49.2%

16.4%Turnover Rate17.3%

26.7%Offensive Rebound %27.6%

45.3%Free Throw Rate35.6%

5.4Average Margin-3.1

MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE

MODEL READ

William & Mary HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY63.1%

STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE

9–2

MMH comparison metrics

WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMWilliam & Mary holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (53.8–44.4), offensive efficiency (112.5–102.6), defensive efficiency (105.2–107.1), net efficiency (7.3–-4.5).

UTEP COUNTERS WITHstrength of schedule (1.7–-1.5), offensive rebounding (27.6–26.7).

Final

William & Mary

74—63

UTEP

William & Mary by 11 • 73.8 estimated possessions

Team Stats

William & MaryTEAM STATUTEP

26-53FG24-65

49.0%FG%37.0%

8-233PT5-25

35.0%3PT%20.0%

14-20FT10-15

70.0%FT%67.0%

40Rebounds33

9Offensive Rebounds12

17Assists10

19Turnovers15

8Steals15

3Blocks2

12Fouls17

Player Box Score

William & Mary

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Kyle Pulliam	G	26	6-11	1-3	3-4	5	1	2	0	16
Reese Miller	G	24	5-7	2-4	4-4	3	3	1	0	16
Chase Lowe	G	18	3-4	0-0	3-4	2	2	0	0	9
Jo'el Emanuel	F	25	2-5	1-1	1-2	3	4	0	1	6
Kilian Brockhoff	F	18	2-8	1-5	1-2	6	1	2	2	6
Cade Haskins	F	18	2-6	1-5	1-2	3	0	1	0	6
Ryan Jackson Jr.	G	24	2-4	0-0	0-0	6	1	0	0	4
Tunde Vahlberg Fasasi	F	23	1-5	1-4	1-2	3	3	1	0	4
Jhei-R Jones	G	22	2-2	0-0	0-0	4	2	1	0	4
Finn Lally	F	2	1-1	1-1	0-0	0	0	0	0	3

UTEP

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Caleb Blackwell	G	29	6-15	1-5	0-0	3	2	3	0	13
Kaseem Watson	F	25	4-10	0-4	3-4	2	0	3	0	11
Cassius Brooks	G	24	3-5	1-2	4-4	5	0	1	0	11
Elijah Jones	F	20	4-6	0-2	2-3	5	0	1	1	10
Jamal West Jr.	F	25	4-7	1-1	0-0	5	0	4	1	9
David Tubek	F	17	2-3	1-1	1-2	5	1	0	0	6
Tyreese Watson	G	30	1-12	1-5	0-2	2	4	2	0	3
KJ Thomas	G	18	0-2	0-1	0-0	1	2	0	0	0
Trey Horton III	G	12	0-5	0-4	0-0	0	1	1	0	0

Advanced Game Stats

73.8Possessions73.8

100.3Offensive Efficiency85.4

85.4Defensive Efficiency100.3

14.9Net Efficiency-14.9

56.6%Effective FG%40.8%

59.2%True Shooting %43.7%

26.2%Turnover Rate20.0%

37.7%Free Throw Rate23.1%

43.4%3-Point Rate38.5%

0.89Assist / Turnover0.67

Game Summary

William & Mary won by 11 points. The game played at approximately 73.8 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Net Efficiency, Effective FG%, True Shooting %.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.