Rutgers

13-20

GAME THAT MATTERSAT

28.2%Rutgers

71.8%Notre Dame

MMH WIN PROBABILITY

MODEL SPREADNotre Dame -7.5

PROJECTED TOTAL149.8

MODEL MONEYLINENotre Dame -255

Notre Dame

13-17

MMH MODEL PROJECTION

Projected ScoreRutgers 71

Projected Total149.8

Projected ScoreNotre Dame 79

Team Comparison

RutgersMetricNotre Dame

45.9MMH Power Index49.7

104.2Offensive Efficiency110.3

112.2Defensive Efficiency111.2

-8.0Net Efficiency-0.9

3.9Strength of Schedule4.7

-1.6Last 10 Net Efficiency-11.6

67.4Tempo68.0

47.4%Effective FG%53.0%

15.0%Turnover Rate17.0%

29.2%Offensive Rebound %31.4%

36.3%Free Throw Rate34.7%

-5.4Average Margin-0.6

MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE

MODEL READ

Notre Dame HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY71.8%

STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE

8–3

MMH comparison metrics

WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMNotre Dame holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (49.7–45.9), offensive efficiency (110.3–104.2), defensive efficiency (111.2–112.2), net efficiency (-0.9–-8.0).

Rutgers COUNTERS WITHrecent form (-1.6–-11.6), ball security (15.0–17.0), free throw rate (36.3–34.7).

Final

Rutgers

63—68

Notre Dame

Notre Dame by 5 • 62.2 estimated possessions

Team Stats

RutgersTEAM STATNotre Dame

20-51FG27-55

39.0%FG%49.0%

11-273PT8-18

41.0%3PT%44.0%

12-17FT6-9

71.0%FT%67.0%

28Rebounds37

11Offensive Rebounds13

12Assists11

14Turnovers16

5Steals6

4Blocks2

14Fouls14

Player Box Score

Rutgers

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Jamichael Davis	G	33	7-12	5-7	2-2	3	3	1	1	21
Dylan Grant	F	34	5-8	3-5	2-2	7	2	1	1	15
Tariq Francis	G	22	2-7	1-3	5-5	1	2	1	0	10
Denis Badalau	F	25	2-6	1-4	0-0	3	2	0	0	5
Bryce Dortch	F	19	2-5	0-0	0-1	2	0	1	0	4
Harun Zrno	G	17	1-5	1-5	0-0	1	2	0	0	3
Darren Buchanan Jr.	G	14	1-3	0-0	1-4	0	0	0	0	3
Chris Nwuli	F	9	0-1	0-0	2-3	1	0	0	0	2
Emmanuel Ogbole	C	12	0-0	0-0	0-0	2	0	0	2	0
Lino Mark	G	8	0-1	0-0	0-0	2	1	1	0	0
Kaden Powers	G	4	0-3	0-3	0-0	0	0	0	0	0
Gevonte Ware	C	3	0-0	0-0	0-0	2	0	0	0	0

Notre Dame

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Markus Burton	G	34	9-13	2-4	1-1	6	5	3	0	21
Jalen Haralson	F	29	6-12	0-0	3-4	1	1	1	0	15
Braeden Shrewsberry	G	33	5-11	3-6	0-0	2	1	0	0	13
Sir Mohammed	G	23	2-2	0-0	2-2	4	3	1	0	6
Garrett Sundra	F	17	2-5	1-2	0-1	4	0	0	1	5
Logan Imes	G	11	1-2	1-1	0-1	3	0	0	0	3
Brady Koehler	F	3	1-3	1-2	0-0	1	0	0	0	3
Carson Towt	F	24	1-3	0-0	0-0	6	0	1	1	2
Kebba Njie	F	14	0-0	0-0	0-0	3	0	0	0	0
Cole Certa	G	11	0-4	0-3	0-0	1	1	0	0	0
Ryder Frost	F	1	0-0	0-0	0-0	0	0	0	0	0

Advanced Game Stats

62.2Possessions62.2

101.3Offensive Efficiency109.3

109.3Defensive Efficiency101.3

-8.0Net Efficiency8.0

50.0%Effective FG%56.4%

53.3%True Shooting %57.4%

22.6%Turnover Rate25.7%

33.3%Free Throw Rate16.4%

52.9%3-Point Rate32.7%

0.86Assist / Turnover0.69

Game Summary

Notre Dame won by 5 points. The game played at approximately 62.2 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Free Throw Rate, Net Efficiency, Offensive Efficiency.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.