East Texas A&M

11-21

GAME THAT MATTERSAT

41.8%East Texas A&M

58.2%Army

MMH WIN PROBABILITY

MODEL SPREADArmy -2.9

PROJECTED TOTAL148.3

MODEL MONEYLINEArmy -139

Army

11-21

MMH MODEL PROJECTION

Projected ScoreEast Texas A&M 73

Projected Total148.3

Projected ScoreArmy 76

Team Comparison

East Texas A&MMetricArmy

38.4MMH Power Index36.8

101.2Offensive Efficiency104.8

107.5Defensive Efficiency112.1

-6.3Net Efficiency-7.3

-1.5Strength of Schedule-3.3

-9.1Last 10 Net Efficiency-10.6

69.3Tempo68.9

50.7%Effective FG%49.8%

18.7%Turnover Rate17.3%

26.3%Offensive Rebound %31.0%

31.9%Free Throw Rate26.5%

-4.3Average Margin-5.1

MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE

MODEL READ

East Texas A&M HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY58.2%

STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE

8–3

MMH comparison metrics

WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMEast Texas A&M holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (38.4–36.8), defensive efficiency (107.5–112.1), net efficiency (-6.3–-7.3), strength of schedule (-1.5–-3.3).

Army COUNTERS WITHoffensive efficiency (104.8–101.2), ball security (17.3–18.7), offensive rebounding (31.0–26.3).

Final

East Texas A&M

84—67

Army

East Texas A&M by 17 • 69.0 estimated possessions

Team Stats

East Texas A&MTEAM STATArmy

27-54FG22-56

50.0%FG%39.0%

12-303PT9-30

40.0%3PT%30.0%

18-22FT14-20

82.0%FT%70.0%

34Rebounds35

6Offensive Rebounds11

14Assists9

12Turnovers13

9Steals2

4Blocks—

20Fouls19

Player Box Score

East Texas A&M

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Damian Garcia	G	21	7-11	4-6	2-3	2	1	1	1	20
Ronnie Harrison	F	19	4-6	2-3	2-2	8	3	0	0	12
Gianni Hunt	G	27	3-6	0-2	4-4	3	4	1	1	10
Josh Taylor	F	24	3-7	0-2	2-3	2	0	2	0	8
Noah Pagotto	F	19	3-4	0-1	2-2	1	0	1	0	8
Tay Mosher	F	12	3-5	2-3	0-0	2	0	0	0	8
Vinny Sigona	G	17	2-5	2-5	0-0	0	2	2	0	6
London Fields	G	19	1-4	1-4	2-2	8	2	0	0	5
Michael Folarin	F	10	0-2	0-0	4-6	3	0	1	2	4
Evan Phelps	G	27	1-4	1-4	0-0	1	1	1	0	3
Alex McCray	G	5	0-0	0-0	0-0	1	1	0	0	0

Army

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	PTS
Kevin McCarthy	G	27	4-9	4-8	0-1	4	1	0	12
Ryan Curry	G	29	3-9	2-7	2-3	3	3	0	10
Joshua Eli	F	12	3-3	0-0	3-3	2	0	0	9
Dillon Watt	G	6	1-1	0-0	4-4	0	1	0	6
Jacen Holloway	F	31	2-8	0-1	1-3	3	2	1	5
Jackson Furman	G	17	2-8	1-6	0-0	0	1	1	5
Jaxson Bell	G	13	2-6	1-3	0-0	3	0	0	5
Tate Laczkowski	F	19	2-3	0-0	0-0	3	0	0	4
Jackson Mayo	G	5	1-2	1-2	1-2	1	0	0	4
Jorn Everson	F	13	1-3	0-2	0-0	1	0	0	2
Alex Engro	G	8	0-0	0-0	2-2	2	0	0	2
Dylan Murans	F	5	1-2	0-1	0-0	1	0	0	2
Dylan Benner	F	4	0-0	0-0	1-2	0	0	0	1
Jahaan Green	G	4	0-2	0-0	0-0	1	0	0	0
Dayon Polk	G	4	0-0	0-0	0-0	2	1	0	0
Brendon O'Keefe	G	3	0-0	0-0	0-0	0	0	0	0

Advanced Game Stats

69.0Possessions69.0

121.7Offensive Efficiency97.1

97.1Defensive Efficiency121.7

24.6Net Efficiency-24.6

61.1%Effective FG%47.3%

65.2%True Shooting %51.1%

17.0%Turnover Rate19.3%

40.7%Free Throw Rate35.7%

55.6%3-Point Rate53.6%

1.17Assist / Turnover0.69

Game Summary

East Texas A&M won by 17 points. The game played at approximately 69.0 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Net Efficiency, Offensive Efficiency, Defensive Efficiency.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.