UTEP

11-20

GAME THAT MATTERSAT

13.0%UTEP

87.0%UAB

MMH WIN PROBABILITY

MODEL SPREADUAB -13.0

PROJECTED TOTAL148.7

MODEL MONEYLINEUAB -669

UAB

20-12

MMH MODEL PROJECTION

Projected ScoreUTEP 68

Projected Total148.7

Projected ScoreUAB 81

Team Comparison

UTEPMetricUAB

44.4MMH Power Index56.9

102.6Offensive Efficiency110.5

107.1Defensive Efficiency102.9

-4.5Net Efficiency7.6

1.7Strength of Schedule0.4

-4.7Last 10 Net Efficiency2.9

67.6Tempo71.7

49.2%Effective FG%48.8%

17.3%Turnover Rate12.4%

27.6%Offensive Rebound %32.7%

35.6%Free Throw Rate36.9%

-3.1Average Margin5.4

MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE

MODEL READ

UAB HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY87.0%

STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE

9–2

MMH comparison metrics

WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMUAB holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (56.9–44.4), offensive efficiency (110.5–102.6), defensive efficiency (102.9–107.1), net efficiency (7.6–-4.5).

UTEP COUNTERS WITHstrength of schedule (1.7–0.4), shooting efficiency (49.2–48.8).

Final

UTEP

59—75

UAB

UAB by 16 • 63.2 estimated possessions

Team Stats

UTEPTEAM STATUAB

20-49FG24-59

41.0%FG%41.0%

8-233PT2-9

35.0%3PT%22.0%

11-15FT25-34

73.0%FT%74.0%

22Rebounds46

5Offensive Rebounds20

12Assists9

13Turnovers7

4Steals10

5Blocks1

22Fouls16

Player Box Score

UTEP

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Elijah Jones	F	27	9-12	1-2	2-2	3	2	1	2	21
Kaseem Watson	F	24	4-8	4-6	1-2	2	0	0	1	13
Tyreese Watson	G	24	2-6	1-1	3-4	2	2	1	0	8
Jamal West Jr.	F	22	2-6	0-1	2-3	2	1	0	1	6
Caleb Blackwell	G	22	2-5	1-3	0-0	2	0	0	0	5
Trey Horton III	G	18	1-4	1-4	0-0	0	1	1	0	3
LA Hayes	G	16	0-3	0-2	2-2	1	1	1	1	2
KJ Thomas	G	18	0-2	0-1	1-2	1	4	0	0	1
Cassius Brooks	G	22	0-1	0-1	0-0	3	1	0	0	0
David Tubek	F	7	0-2	0-2	0-0	2	0	0	0	0

UAB

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Jacob Meyer	G	37	9-16	0-1	3-4	5	1	1	0	21
Chance Westry	G	31	4-10	0-2	6-10	4	3	1	0	14
Evan Chatman	F	37	2-4	0-1	7-8	9	1	1	0	11
Ahmad Robinson	G	25	4-10	1-3	2-2	3	0	3	0	11
Daniel Rivera	F	24	3-9	0-0	3-4	7	1	1	1	9
KyeRon Lindsay-Martin	F	18	1-6	0-0	4-6	10	1	1	0	6
Salim London	G	16	1-4	1-2	0-0	2	2	2	0	3
Dayjaun Anderson	G	12	0-0	0-0	0-0	0	0	0	0	0

Advanced Game Stats

63.2Possessions63.2

93.4Offensive Efficiency118.7

118.7Defensive Efficiency93.4

-25.3Net Efficiency25.3

49.0%Effective FG%42.4%

52.6%True Shooting %49.9%

20.3%Turnover Rate11.3%

30.6%Free Throw Rate57.6%

46.9%3-Point Rate15.3%

0.92Assist / Turnover1.29

Game Summary

UAB won by 16 points. The game played at approximately 63.2 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Net Efficiency, Free Throw Rate, Offensive Efficiency.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.